KADAMOVAS v. LOCKETT et al
| JURIJUS KADAMOVAS |
| BRACE, B. BRANDENBURG, JOHN DOES, JOHN EDWARDS, STEVEN LEVETT, CHARLES L. LOCKETT, MICHAEL STEVENS and WILLIAM E. WILSON |
| 2:2011cv00258 |
| September 28, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
| Terre Haute Office |
| William T. Lawrence |
| William G. Hussmann |
| Prisoner Petitions - Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
150
ENTRY ON DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT - This cause is before the Court on the Defendants' motion for summary judgment (Dkt. No. 146 .) The motion is fully briefed, and the Court, being duly advised, GRANTS the motion, for the reasons set forth below. (See Entry.) Signed by Judge William T. Lawrence on 1/6/2017. (RSF)
|
|
Filing
118
ENTRY FOLLOWING PAVEY HEARING - This cause is before the Court following an evidentiary hearing pursuant to Pavey v. Conley, 544 F.3d 739 (7th Cir. 2008), which was held on March 3, 2016. The Plaintiff, Jurijus Kadamovas, was present via videocon ferencing system and by counsel. The Defendants were present by counsel. In addition to documentary evidence, the Court heard testimony from the Plaintiff and several employees of the Penitentiary in Terre Haute, Indiana ("USP Terre Haute&quo t;): Melinda Caulton, Administrative Remedy Clerk and Associate Warden's Secretary; Unit Manager Michael Stephens; Case Counselor John Edwards; Case Manager Todd Royer; and the Plaintiff. The Court finds that the Plaintiff has fully exhausted his administrative remedies only as to the issue raised in paragraph 84 of his Amended Complaint. Accordingly, the Court GRANTS the Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment 4 as to all other allegations in the Amended Complaint and dismisses a ll non- exhausted claims in the Amended Complaint without prejudice. The Court DENIES AS MOOT the Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to File Proposed Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law 114 . This case will proceed to trial to resolve the a llegation contained in Paragraph 84 of the Amended Complaint. The Court will request that Magistrate Judge Dinsmore conduct a pretrial conference to establish a schedule to prepare this case for trial. (See Entry.) Signed by Judge William T. Lawrence on 4/21/2016. (RSF)
|
|
Filing
90
ENTRY ON DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT - The Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment 74 is GRANTED IN PART and the claims in the Amended Complaint against Defendants Heiser and Royer are dismissed with prejudice. The remain der of the Defendants' motion for summary judgment is DENIED. Before the status conference scheduled with Magistrate Judge Hussmann on October 2, 2015, the parties should confer and be prepared to propose a schedule for discovery in anticipation of a Pavey hearing. (See Order.) Signed by Judge William T. Lawrence on 8/31/2015. (RSF)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
