GATES et al v. WABASH VALLEY CORRECTION FACILITY et al
| ARTHUR LEE GATES, JR. |
| MS. JESSICA GADBERRY, INDIANA DEPT OF CORRECTIONS, SERGEANT R. PADGETT, OFFICER M. PETTY, SERGEANT S. FISCHER, WABASH VALLEY CORRECTION FACILITY and SUPT. R. BROWN |
| 2:2011cv00280 |
| October 14, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
| Terre Haute Office |
| Denise K. LaRue |
| Jane Magnus-Stinson |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
7
ENTRY - The plaintiff's request to proceed in forma pauperis 2 is denied. For plaintiff Gates' reference, the cases on which the court relies in finding three or more "strikes" were each filed in the United States District Cour t for the Southern District of Indiana, and consist of the following: EV 92-73-C Dismissed as legally frivolous EV 90-71-C Dismissed as legally frivolous EV 93-31-C Dismissed as legally frivolous TH 96-88-C Dismissed as legally frivolous EV93-008-C D ismissed as legally frivolous These prior "strikes" were brought to Mr. Gates' attention in the Entry issued on December 13, 2007, in No. 3:07-cv-178-SEB-WGH. The plaintiff shall have through November 15, 2011, in which to pay the $350.00 filing fee for this action. Signed by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson on 10/24/2011.(copy to plaintiff via us mail) (VS)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
