WILLIAMS v. KNIGHT

WILLIAMS v. KNIGHT

Petitioner:	JOSEPH WILLIAMS
Respondent:	STANLEY KNIGHT
Case Number:	2:2012cv00033
Filed:	February 8, 2012
Court:	US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana
Office:	Terre Haute Office
Presiding Judge:	Jane Magnus-Stinson
Presiding Judge:	William G. Hussmann
Nature of Suit:	Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
September 10, 2012	Filing 22 ENTRY - The motion for ruling on motion 18 is denied as moot because the court ruled on the motion referenced therein on September 6, 2012. In order for a Rule 60(b) movant to obtain the relief requested, he must show that he had both grounds for relief, Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b)(1)-(5), and a meritorious claim or defense. Williams' motion for relief from judgment 20 does not show either of these circumstances. That motion 20 is therefore denied. (See Entry.) Copy to petitioner via US Mail. Signed by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson on 9/10/2012. (RSF)
July 17, 2012	Filing 13 ENTRY - granting 8 Motion to Dismiss. Judgment dismissing this action for lack of jurisdiction shall now issue. The status conference set for August 10, 2012 is vacated. (See Entry.) Copy to petitioner via US Mail. Signed by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson on 7/17/2012. (RSF)

Date Filed

Document Text

September 10, 2012

Filing 22 ENTRY - The motion for ruling on motion 18 is denied as moot because the court ruled on the motion referenced therein on September 6, 2012. In order for a Rule 60(b) movant to obtain the relief requested, he must show that he had both grounds for relief, Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b)(1)-(5), and a meritorious claim or defense. Williams' motion for relief from judgment 20 does not show either of these circumstances. That motion 20 is therefore denied. (See Entry.) Copy to petitioner via US Mail. Signed by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson on 9/10/2012. (RSF)

July 17, 2012

Filing 13 ENTRY - granting 8 Motion to Dismiss. Judgment dismissing this action for lack of jurisdiction shall now issue. The status conference set for August 10, 2012 is vacated. (See Entry.) Copy to petitioner via US Mail. Signed by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson on 7/17/2012. (RSF)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: WILLIAMS v. KNIGHT
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Respondent: STANLEY KNIGHT
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Petitioner: JOSEPH WILLIAMS
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?