ACON v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
| GLENN ACON |
| UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, MS. S. BEIGHLEY, H. G. CHURCH, KIMBERLY KLINK, CHARLES L. LOCKETT, A. RUPSKA and CHARLES E. SAMUELS, JR. |
| 2:2012cv00135 |
| May 29, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
| Terre Haute Office |
| Jane Magnus-Stinson |
| William G. Hussmann |
| Habeas Corpus (Prison Condition) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
32
Entry Discussing Motion for Summary Judgment - The defendants' motion for summary judgment [dkt. 29] is granted. Judgment consistent with this Entry shall now issue. (See Entry.) Copy to plaintiff via US Mail. Signed by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson on 6/13/2013. (RSF)
|
|
Filing
17
Entry Discussing Amended Complaint and Directing Further Proceedings - The claims against Charles Lockett, Charles Samuels, Jr., A. Rupska, and Kimberly Klink are dismissed as legally insufficient because these officials are not alleged to have had personal involvement in the treatment of Acon's condition or the denial of medication or treatment sought by him. No partial final judgment shall issue at this time as to the claim(s) resolved in this Entry. The clerk is directed to terminat e the United States of America and H.G. Church as defendants on the docket because they were not named as defendants in the amended complaint. Claims against Ms. J. Beighley and Ms. Z. Ndife shall proceed as submitted. The clerk is designated pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(c)(3) to issue process to defendants Beighley and Ndife. Process shall consist of a summons. (See Entry.) Copies mailed pursuant to distribution list. Signed by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson on 9/18/2012.(RSF)
|
|
Filing
9
Entry Directing Further Proceedings - granting 5 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis; denying 6 Motion to Appoint Counsel; and denying 1 Motion for temporary injunctive relief. The plaintiff shall also have through July 2, 2012, in which to identify the jurisdictional basis for his claim against each of the defendants. This report shall include a complete statement of what specific relief is sought from each of the defendants. (See Entry.) Copy to plaintiff via US Mail. Signed by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson on 6/13/2012. (RSF)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
