PAYTON v. KNIGHT

PAYTON v. KNIGHT

Petitioner:	JOHN PAYTON
Respondent:	STANLEY KNIGHT
Case Number:	2:2012cv00151
Filed:	June 11, 2012
Court:	US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana
Office:	Terre Haute Office
Presiding Judge:	Jane Magnus-Stinson
Presiding Judge:	William G. Hussmann
Nature of Suit:	Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
January 25, 2013	Filing 19 Entry Discussing Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus - The petition for a writ of habeas corpus must be denied and the action dismissed. Judgment consistent with this Entry shall now issue. (See Entry.) Copy to petitioner via US Mail. Signed by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson on 1/25/2013.(RSF)
June 15, 2012	Filing 4 Entry Directing Further Proceedings - granting 2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. He shall have through July 20, 2012, in which to pay the $5.00 filing fee. Petitioner Payton shall have through July 20, 2012, in which to file an amended petition for a writ of habeas corpus which coherently sets forth his claim(s) for relief. The petition he filed omitted page 3 and contains no statement of his claims for relief. He must do more than state "see attached." Th e clerk shall include with the petitioner's copy of this Entry a copy of his petition for a writ of habeas corpus and exhibits thereto. The petitioner does not need to re-file all of the exhibits that were attached to his original petition. (See Entry.) Copy to petitioner via US Mail. Signed by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson on 6/15/2012. (RSF)

Date Filed

Document Text

January 25, 2013

Filing 19 Entry Discussing Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus - The petition for a writ of habeas corpus must be denied and the action dismissed. Judgment consistent with this Entry shall now issue. (See Entry.) Copy to petitioner via US Mail. Signed by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson on 1/25/2013.(RSF)

June 15, 2012

Filing 4 Entry Directing Further Proceedings - granting 2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. He shall have through July 20, 2012, in which to pay the $5.00 filing fee. Petitioner Payton shall have through July 20, 2012, in which to file an amended petition for a writ of habeas corpus which coherently sets forth his claim(s) for relief. The petition he filed omitted page 3 and contains no statement of his claims for relief. He must do more than state "see attached." Th e clerk shall include with the petitioner's copy of this Entry a copy of his petition for a writ of habeas corpus and exhibits thereto. The petitioner does not need to re-file all of the exhibits that were attached to his original petition. (See Entry.) Copy to petitioner via US Mail. Signed by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson on 6/15/2012. (RSF)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: PAYTON v. KNIGHT
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Respondent: STANLEY KNIGHT
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Petitioner: JOHN PAYTON
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?