LINDLEY v. COMMISSIONER OF THE SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
| JANET M. LINDLEY |
| COMMISSIONER OF THE SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION |
| SSA (Court Use Only) |
| 2:2012cv00190 |
| July 3, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
| Terre Haute Office |
| William T. Lawrence |
| William G. Hussmann |
| Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID) |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
34
ENTRY ON MOTION FOR ATTORNEY'S FEES - Before the Court is the Plaintiff's Motion for Attorney's Fees under the Equal Access to Justice Act ("EAJA") 27 . This motion is fully briefed, and the Court, being duly advised, now GRANTS the Plaintiff's motion. Accordingly, Plaintiff's counsel is awarded $7,868.47 in fees. (See Entry.) Signed by Judge William T. Lawrence on 1/31/2014. (RSF)
|
|
Filing
25
ENTRY ON JUDICIAL REVIEW - Plaintiff Janet M. Lindley requests judicial review of the final decision of the Defendant, Carolyn W. Colvin, Commissioner of the Social Security Administration ("Commissioner"), denying Lindley's applica tion for Disability Insurance Benefits ("DIB"). The Commissioner's decision is REVERSED, and this case is REMANDED for further proceedings consistent with this Entry. (See Entry.) Signed by Judge William T. Lawrence on 9/20/2013.(RSF)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
