WILLIAMS et al v. INDIANA STATE POLICE et al
TYLER D. WILLIAMS and WILLIAM E. WILLIAMS |
INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES, INDIANA STATE POLICE, PUTNAM COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT and TOWN OF CLOVERDALE |
J. W. |
JOHN CHADD |
CHARLES HALLAM |
PATRICK LABHART and CHRIS SPRINGSTUN |
BRIAN S. THOMAS |
2:2012cv00324 |
November 2, 2012 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
Terre Haute Office |
Denise K. LaRue |
Jane Magnus-Stinson |
Civil Rights: Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
Both |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 131 AMENDED ORDER - The Court issues this Amended Order solely to address whether the Court should properly exercise supplemental jurisdiction over Plaintiffs' state-law claims. Defendants are entitled to summary judgment on all Plaintiffs' ; claims. Specifically, the Court GRANTS Officer Chadd and Sheriff Fenwick's Motion for Summary Judgment, [Filing No. 75], GRANTS Cloverdale's Motion for Summary Judgment, [Filing No. 80], GRANTS the IDNR, the ISP, and Officers Labhart, Springstun, and Thomas' Motion for Summary Judgment, [Filing No. 82], and GRANTS Officer Hallam's Motion for Summary Judgment, [Filing No. 84]. Finally, the Court DENIES Officer Chadd's and Sheriff Fenwick's Motion to Strike. [Filing No. 125.] Final Judgment will issue accordingly. (See Order.) Signed by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson on 6/13/2014.(RSF) |
Filing 129 ORDER - Presently pending before the Court are four Motions for Summary Judgment filed by (1) Defendants Putnam County Sheriff Steve Fenwick and his Deputy John Chadd,1 [Filing No. 75]; (2) Defendant Town of Cloverdale ("Cloverdale"), [F iling No. 80]; (3) Defendants Indiana Department of Natural Resources ("IDNR"), Indiana State Police ("ISP"), IDNR Officers Patrick Labhart and Chris Springstun, and ISP Officer Brian Thomas, [Filing No. 82]; and (4) Defendant Cloverdale Police Department Officer Charles Hallam, [Filing No. 84]. Also pending is a Motion to Strike filed by Defendants Chadd and Fenwick. For the reasons that follow, all four Motions for Summary Judgment are GRANTED and Officer Chadd's and Sheriff Fenwick's Motion to Strike, [Filing No. 125] is DENIED. Final Judgment will issue accordingly. Signed by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson on 6/11/2014. (RSF) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.