INDIANAPOLIS FRUIT COMPANY v. HARTLAND FOODS CORP. D/B/A HARTLAND SHOPWORTH et al
Plaintiff: INDIANAPOLIS FRUIT COMPANY
Defendant: STEPHEN HART and HARTLAND FOODS CORP. D/B/A HARTLAND SHOPWORTH
Case Number: 2:2012cv00336
Filed: November 13, 2012
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana
Office: Terre Haute Office
Presiding Judge: Mark J. Dinsmore
Presiding Judge: Jane Magnus-Stinson
Nature of Suit: Agriculture Acts
Cause of Action: 07 U.S.C. ยง 499 Agricultural Commodities Act
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
November 14, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER To Show Cause and TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER - Presently before the Court is Plaintiff Indianapolis Fruit Company's ("IFC") Emergency Motion for Temporary Restraining Order. [Dkt. 5 .] The Court ORDERS that Defendants, Hartl and Foods Corp. d/b/ Hartland Shopworth ("Hartland") and Stephen Hart, SHOW CAUSE before this Court on Tuesday, November 20, 2012, at 9:00 a.m., in Courtroom 307, Birch Bayh Federal Building and United States Courthouse, 46 East Ohio Stre et, Indianapolis, Indiana, why an order should not be issued pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 65 enjoining Mr. Hart and Hartland from paying, withdrawing, transferring, assigning or selling any and all existing assets of the trust creat ed by the Perishable Agricultural Commodities Act, or otherwise disposing of other corporate or personal assets to any creditors, persons or entities, until further order of this Court or until Hartland and Mr. Hart pay IFC the sum of $25,620. 53 by certified or cashier's check, at which time this Order is dissolved. Therefore, the Court ORDERS that, pending the hearing on IFC's Motion for Issuance of a Preliminary Injunction, [dkt. 7 ], and pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil P rocedure 65, Mr. Hart and Hartland are TEMPORARILY RESTRAINED. It is further ORDERED that, pursuant to Rule 65(c), IFC shall post a de minimus bond of $100.00. Given that the hearing on IFC's Motion for Issuance of a Preliminary Injunction is being scheduled on an expedited basis, the Court DENIES IFC's request, made in that motion, to consolidate the trial on the merits with the hearing on IFC's request for a preliminary injunction, [dkt. 7 at 3]. Finally, the Court ORDERS IFC to serve a copy of this Order by overnight mail upon Hartland and Mr. Hart on or before November 15, 2012, at 6:00 p.m. (SEE ORDER). Signed by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson on 11/14/2012. (JKS)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: INDIANAPOLIS FRUIT COMPANY v. HARTLAND FOODS CORP. D/B/A HARTLAND SHOPWORTH et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: STEPHEN HART
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: HARTLAND FOODS CORP. D/B/A HARTLAND SHOPWORTH
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: INDIANAPOLIS FRUIT COMPANY
Represented By: Jason R. Burke
Represented By: David A. Adelman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?