CARRUTHERS v. CORRECTIONS CORPERATION OF AMERICA, MEDICAL STAFF
| MICHAEL CARRUTHERS |
| JINNIFER BEG BUCHANAN, CORRECTIONS CORPERATION OF AMERICA, MEDICAL STAFF, DR. BERGER, DR. PROPST, JANE/JOHN DOE, RN LITTLE, RN SHULL, M. ROBINSON and A.W. STEPHENSON |
| 2:2014cv00072 |
| March 17, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
| Terre Haute Office |
| Denise K. LaRue |
| William T. Lawrence |
| Prisoner Petitions - Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
56
Entry Discussing Motion for Summary Judgment - Plaintiff Michael Carruthers, an inmate at the Pendleton Correctional Facility, brings this action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. ' 1983, alleging that defendants Dr. Berger, Nurse Little, and Nurse Shull (the "Individual Medical Defendants") and Corrections Corporation of America ("CCA") were deliberately indifferent to his serious medical needs while he was housed at the Marion County Jail II ("Jail II"). Mr. Carruth ers also alleges that defendant Jinnifer Buchanan retaliated against him for filing grievances regarding his medication. The defendants have moved for summary judgment and Mr. Carruthers has failed to respond. For the following reasons, the motion for summary judgment [dkt 52] is granted. Judgment consistent with this Entry shall now issue. Signed by Judge William T. Lawrence on 8/12/2015. (RSF)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
