BROCK v. WILSON et al
MARK A. BROCK |
ALLEN, JULIE BEIGHLEY, ERIC HOLDER, ALEX JASTILLANO, ROGER JONES, KIMBERLY KLINK and WILLIAM WILSON |
2:2014cv00170 |
June 10, 2014 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
Terre Haute Office |
Mark J. Dinsmore |
Jane Magnus-Stinson |
Prisoner Petitions - Prison Condition |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 154 Entry Discussing Motion for Summary Judgment - Plaintiff Mark Brock ("Mr. Brock"), a federal prisoner incarcerated at the Gilmer Federal Correctional Facility, in Glenville, West Virginia, brings this action pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unkn own Named Agents, 403 U.S. 388 (1971), and the Federal Tort Claim Act ("FTCA"). He alleges that the defendants were deliberately indifferent to his serious medical condition of aggressive fibromatosis in violation of the Eighth Amendment and were negligent when they delayed treating his condition, which constituted medical malpractice. Defendants Dr. William Wilson, Dr. Roger Jones, Alex Jastillano, Dr. Allen, and the United States of America moved for summary judgment. The plain tiff filed a response in opposition and the defendants have replied. For the following reasons, the motions for summary judgment [Dkt. 136 , 138 ] are granted. Judgment consistent with this ruling shall now issue. Signed by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson on 3/9/2017. (RSF) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.