COLLIER v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
| ANTHONY LEON COLLIER |
| ALL MEMBERS OF THE UTILIZATION REVIEW COMMITTEE, T. BAILEY, T. BIXLER, HOLLIE BOWMAN, J. F. CARAWAY, COMPLAINT EXAMINERS, C. DESMITH, DANNA DOBBINS, JOHN AND JANE DOES 1-30, DOUGHTERY, ANTHONY GARCIA, JOHN GOLISH, ALEX JASTILLANO, MELINDA JOY, KIMBERLY KLINX, L. LARIVA, AMY MCDONALD, REGION BOARD MEMBERS, ANDY RUPSKA, F. SEMAIA, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, WARDEN DESIGNEE, THOMAS WEBSTER, E. WILLIAMS, J. WILLIAMS and DR. WILSON |
| 2:2014cv00365 |
| December 2, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
| Terre Haute Office |
| Jane Magnus-Stinson |
| William G. Hussmann |
| Prisoner Petitions - Prison Condition |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
178
ORDER - Mr. Collier has failed to demonstrate that there is a genuine issue as to whether Defendants acted with deliberate indifference to his medical conditions. Therefore, the Court GRANTS Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment. [Filing No. 164 .] Final judgment will issue accordingly (SEE ORDER FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION). Signed by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson on 12/11/2017. (DW) Modified on 12/11/2017 (DW).
|
|
Filing
148
ORDER - Accordingly, because the question for which Mr. Collier seeks certification for interlocutory appeal is not contestable, the portion of the Motion to Reconsider requesting certification 106 is DENIED (SEE ORDER). Signed by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson on 6/26/2017. (DW)
|
|
Filing
147
MARGINAL ENTRY denying as moot Nephcare's 102 Motion for Summary Judgment - SEE ENTRY. Signed by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson on 6/22/2017.(JRB)
|
|
Filing
146
ENTRY ON PLAINTIFF'S COUNSEL'S MOTIONS TO WITHDRAW - The Court cannot grant Counsel's motions without effecting substantial prejudice upon Mr. Collier, this Court, and Defendants. Given the impending critical case deadlines and the time and effort put into this case to-date, the Court DENIES Plaintiff's Counsel's verified motions to withdraw. [Dkt. 140 ; Dkt. 141 ; Dkt. 142 (SEE ENTRY). Signed by Magistrate Judge Mark J. Dinsmore on 6/20/2017. (DW)
|
|
Filing
117
ORDER ON PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO RECONSIDER PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE A SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT - Plaintiff's Motion to Reconsider Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to File a Second Amended Complaint [Dkt. 106 ] attempts to circumvent the Rule 72(a) time limits to rehash previously rejected arguments. The Court therefore DENIES IN PART Plaintiff's Motion (See Order for Additional Information). Signed by Magistrate Judge Mark J. Dinsmore on 3/22/2017. (DW)
|
|
Filing
97
ORDER ON PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE A SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT: For the foregoing reasons, the Court DENIES IN PART Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to File a Second Amended Complaint. [Dkt. 85 .] ***SEE ENTRY FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION***. Signed by Magistrate Judge Mark J. Dinsmore on 1/24/2017. (DW)
|
|
Filing
69
Entry Discussing Defendants' Third Motion For Summary Judgment and Directing Further Proceedings - Plaintiff Anthony Leon Collier ("Mr. Collier"), is a former federal inmate formerly confined at the Federal Correctional Institution i n Terre Haute, Indiana ("FCI Terre Haute"). After screening the amended complaint and dismissing some claims, the Court determined that Mr. Collier's claims of deliberate indifference to a serious medical need and retaliation would proceed against the following defendants: 1) Warden Caraway; 2) Warden L. LaRiva; 3) Dr. T. Bailey; 4) PA Daugherty; 5) C. Desmith; and 6) Hollie Bowman (the "Defendants"). Although Mr. Collier's amended complaint was filed pro se, he is now represented by counsel. The Defendants' motion for summary judgment on the issue of exhaustion of administrative remedies 54 is denied in part and granted in part. Mr. Collier's motion in opposition requesting that the Court deny the Defendants' motion for summary judgment 66 is denied in part and granted in part. Accordingly, Mr. Collier's retaliation claim is dismissed without prejudice. Mr. Collier's Eighth Amendment claims of deliberate indifferenc e to his serious medical needs shall proceed on the merits. The Magistrate Judge is requested to set this matter for a status conference to establish a pretrial schedule for the development and resolution of Mr. Collier's claims of deliberate indifference. The Magistrate Judge is also requested to set a settlement conference in this action. (See Entry.) Copy to MJD via email. Signed by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson on 7/27/2016. (RSF)
|
|
Filing
53
Entry Granting in Part and Denying in Part Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment and Directing Further Proceedings - Plaintiff Anthony Leon Collier ("Mr. Collier"), is a former federal inmate formerly confined at the United States Penitentiary in Terre Haute, Indiana ("USP-TH"). After screening the amended complaint and dismissing some claims, the Court determined that Mr. Collier's claims of deliberate indifference to a serious medical need and retaliation would proceed. In summary, the Defendants' motion for summary judgment 39 is granted as to the claim against Ms. Klink and denied without prejudice as to the defense of failure to exhaust available administrative remedies. Defendants shall have through February 3, 2016. The Court will issue a pretrial schedule to guide the further development of the action and will attempt to recruit Mediation Assistance Program ("MAP") counsel to assist Mr. Collier in a settlement confer ence. The clerk shall update the docket to reflect 1) the correction of the spelling of defendants "Klink" and "Daugherty," and 2) the dismissal of the claim against Kimberly Klink. (See Entry.) Copy to plaintiff via US Mail. Signed by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson on 1/20/2016. (RSF)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
