GAINES v. PUTNAMVILLE CORRECTIONAL FACILITY et al
| DEANGELO GAINES |
| CONNIE ALLEN, BRYAN BULLER, FARRAH BUNCH, CORIZON HEALTH, KATHY EDRINGTON, ELMORE, GOSS, GREENWELL, BECKY HALL, ELESHA HILDAGO, JESSICA HIRT, HUGHETT, LOLIT JOSEPH, HOUMAN KIANI, KIRKLAND, K. KUMERAN, ALISIA LAWRENCE, HOWARD LEWIS, LYTLE, KAYLA MCDERMIT, DAVID MICKELS, GRAHAM MOORE, MOOTHERLY, MIKE NATALIE, REBECCA NISPEL, ANN PELL, PUTNAMVILLE CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, NAVEEN RAJOLI, SAURO, THERESA STRAW, DEAN TREASH, MELISA TUCKER, ALEXANDREA WARREN and DEBORAH WHITE |
| 2:2016cv00139 |
| April 25, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
| Terre Haute Office |
| Denise K. LaRue |
| William T. Lawrence |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
245
Entry Granting Defendants' Unopposed Motion for Summary Judgment - Mr. Gaines has failed to present any evidence that would create a genuine issue of material fact as to his claims against the Defendants in this action. The Defendants have submitted undisputed admissible evidence showing that they are entitled to judgment as a matter of law. The unopposed motion for summary judgment filed by the Defendants, dkt. 230 , is granted. Final judgment shall issue consistent with this Entry and with the screening Entry, dkt. 11 , the stipulation of dismissal and termination of some defendants, dkt. 141 , dkt. 151 , dkt. 174 , dkt. 204 , and dkt. 219 , and a prior summary judgment ruling, dkt. 244 . In sum, all claims against all defendants are dismissed with prejudice. (See Entry.) Copy to Plaintiff via U.S. Mail. Signed by Judge James R. Sweeney II on 11/26/2018. (DMW)
|
|
Filing
244
Entry Granting Defendant Aluker's Unopposed Motion for Summary Judgment - Mr. Gaines has failed to present any evidence that would create a genuine issue of material fact as to his claim of deliberate indifference against Dr. Aluker in this a ction. Dr. Aluker's motion requesting a ruling on his motion for summary judgment, dkt. 242 , is granted. The unopposed motion for summary judgment filed by Dr. Aluker, dkt. 235 , is granted. No partial final judgment shall issue at this time. (See Entry.) Copy to Plaintiff via U.S. Mail. Signed by Judge James R. Sweeney II on 11/2/2018. (DMW)
|
|
Filing
11
Entry Screening Amended Complaint, Dismissing Insufficient Claims, and Directing Service of Process - Plaintiff Deangelo Gaines ("Mr. Gaines"), an inmate at the Putnamville Correctional Facility ("Putnamville"), brought this acti on on April 25, 2016, pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against Corizon Health ("Corizon") and a number of individual defendants. He alleges that the defendants were deliberately indifferent to his serious medical needs, retaliated again st him, denied his equal rights, and violated his rights under the Americans with Disabilities Act ("ADA") and Rehabilitation Act ("Rehab Act") during his incarceration at Putnamville. His constitutional claims are brought under the First, Eighth, and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution. He filed an amended complaint on June 8, 2016. No partial final judgment shall issue at this time as to the claims that are dismissed in this Entry. With the change i n defendant in Claim 4 noted in Part I. C. above, Claims 1 through 4 shall proceed against the named defendants. The clerk is designated pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(c) to issue process to the defendants numbered 1 through 19 and the Indiana Department of Correction in the manner specified by Rule 4(d). (See Entry.) Copies distributed pursuant to distribution list. Signed by Judge William T. Lawrence on 7/18/2016.(RSF)
|
|
Filing
5
Entry Granting In Forma Pauperis Status, Discussing Complaint, and Directing Plaintiff to File Amended Complaint - The plaintiff's motion to proceed in forma pauperis 1 is granted. The assessment of an initial partial filing fee is not feas ible at this time. Notwithstanding the foregoing ruling, the plaintiff still owes the $350.00 filing fee. A large portion of Claim 1 is time-barred. The allegations in Claim 1 are not clear, however, as to who denied Mr. Gaines' request s for a seizure helmet after April 25, 2014. The Court will not direct service of process until it is more clear which defendants personally participated in wrongdoing during the relevant time period. Mr. Gaines shall have through June 15, 2016, in which to file an amended complaint. (See Entry for additional information.) Copy to plaintiff via US Mail. Signed by Judge William T. Lawrence on 5/16/2016. (RSF)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
