GILMAN v. CORIZON MEDICAL SERVICES et al
Plaintiff: JAMES E. GILMAN
Defendant: SAMUEL BYRD, CORIZON MEDICAL SERVICES, MONICA GIPSON, ESTER HINTON, KIM HOPSON, C. PEARISON, REGIONAL MEDICAL DIRECTORS, B. RIGGS and AMY WRIGHT
Miscellaneous: WVCF (Court Use Only)
Case Number: 2:2016cv00194
Filed: June 2, 2016
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana
Office: Terre Haute Office
Presiding Judge: Mark J. Dinsmore
Presiding Judge: Jane Magnus-Stinson
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Prison Condition
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
August 20, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 189 Order Granting Motion for Summary Judgment And Directing Entry of Final Judgment - Plaintiff James Gilman, an inmate at the Wabash Valley Correctional Facility ("Wabash"), brings this action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 alleging tha t his Eighth Amendment rights have been violated because he received inadequate medical care for his knee pain while incarcerated. The defendants' motion for summary judgment, dkt. 159 , is granted. Judgment consistent with this Order and the Order of August 10, 2016, (dkt. 8 ) screening Mr. Gilman's complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A, shall now issue. (See Order.) Signed by Judge James R. Sweeney II on 8/20/2019. (DMW)
December 12, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 128 ENTRY Granting Motion to Appoint Rule 706 Neutral Expert - 123 Motion to Appoint Rule 706 Neutral Expert is GRANTED consistent with the following rulings: 87 Motion for Expedited Ruling is DENIED as moot. 88 Motion for Petition for Funds i s DENIED as moot. Because the foregoing ruling could impact the briefing of the defendants' motion for summary judgment, 118 Motion for Summary Judgment is DENIED for the present without prejudice. 125 Motion to Stay Briefing is DENIED as moot. See Entry for details. Signed by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson on 12/12/2017. (LBT)
April 14, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 82 ENTRY Discussing Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings - For the foregoing reasons, the State Defendants are not entitled to judgment on the pleadings on Gilman's claims against them and their motion for judgment on the pleadings [dkt 53 ] is denied (SEE ENTRY FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION). Signed by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson on 4/14/2017. (DW)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: GILMAN v. CORIZON MEDICAL SERVICES et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: SAMUEL BYRD
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: CORIZON MEDICAL SERVICES
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: MONICA GIPSON
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: ESTER HINTON
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: KIM HOPSON
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: C. PEARISON
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: REGIONAL MEDICAL DIRECTORS
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: B. RIGGS
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: AMY WRIGHT
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: JAMES E. GILMAN
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Miscellaneous: WVCF (Court Use Only)
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?