REED v. BOWEN et al
| ANTHONY WAYNE REED |
| BENSON, MARK J. BOWEN, JANE DOE, CINDY GITMAN, J. MILLER and JASON SLODERBECK |
| 2:2016cv00319 |
| August 15, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
| Terre Haute Office |
| Mark J. Dinsmore |
| William T. Lawrence |
| Prisoner Petitions - Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
98
Entry Granting Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment and Directing Entry of Final Judgment - The defendants' motion for summary judgment, Dkt. No. 57 , is granted. The plaintiff's motion in opposition to motion for summary judgment, Dkt. No. 85 , is denied. The plaintiff's motion for extension of time to file a surreply, Dkt. No. 97 , is denied. The Court previously granted him two extensions of time to file a surreply. Dkt. No. 94 ; Dkt. No. 96 . In the second order granting Mr. Reed time to file a surreply, the Court gave him through June 1, 2018, and warned him that no further extensions would be granted. Judgment consistent with this Entry shall now issue. Signed by Judge William T. Lawrence on 6/8/2018. (DW)
|
|
Filing
49
Entry Discussing Plaintiff's Motion to Compel - Plaintiff Anthony Reed has filed a motion to compel asserting that the defendants are not complying with his discovery requests. More specifically, Mr. Reed states that the defendants failed to r espond to request numbers 10, 11, 14, 15, and 24 in his request for production of documents. He alleges that in response to his effort to resolve the discovery dispute pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure Rule 37, the defendants did not pr ovide the requested information and instead offered excuses. The underlying theme in Mr. Reed's motion to compel is that he is seeking information that the defendants contend they do not have. The motion to compel, [dkt. 42 ], is granted in part and denied in part. The plaintiff's motion for extension of time to file a reply to the defendants' response in opposition to the motion to compel, [dkt. 45 ], is denied as moot. (See Entry.) Signed by Judge William T. Lawrence on 8/10/2017. (RSF)
|
|
Filing
9
Entry Dismissing Insufficient Claims and Directing Further Proceedings - On September 1, 2016, the Court dismissed the plaintiff's complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b) and directed him to show cause why this action should not be d ismissed for failure to state a claim. On October 4, 2016, the petitioner filed a response to the Court's show cause order. For the reasons set forth in the entry of September 1, 2016, the following claims are still dismissed. The Hamilton Co unty Jail is dismissed as a defendant. The plaintiff's First Amendment claim for retaliation set forth in the complaint filed on August 15, 2016, against J. Miller may proceed. 2. The plaintiff's conditions of confinement claim set forth in the complaint filed on August 15, 2016, against defendants Mark Bowen and Jason Sloderback may proceed.The clerk is designated pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(c)(3). (See Entry.) Copies distributed pursuant to distribution list. Signed by Judge William T. Lawrence on 11/9/2016.(RSF)
|
|
Filing
6
Entry Dismissing Complaint - Plaintiff Anthony W. Reed, an inmate at Putnamville Correctional Facility, filed this civil action for incidents that occurred while Reed was incarcerated at the Hamilton County Jail. Reed alleges that the defendants Ma rk Bowen, Jason Sloderbeck, Lt. Benson, J. Miller, Cindy Gitman and Jane Doe violated his constitutional rights in a variety of ways. Reed's complaint is dismissed for failure to state a claim. He shall have October 3, 2016, in which to show cause why Judgment consistent with this Entry should not issue. (See Entry.) Copy to plaintiff via US Mail. Signed by Judge William T. Lawrence on 9/1/2016.(RSF)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
