MASON v. CORIZON INC.
| MICHAEL D. MASON |
| CORIZON INC. |
| WVCF (Court Use Only) |
| 2:2017cv00145 |
| March 31, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
| Terre Haute Office |
| Mark J. Dinsmore |
| William T. Lawrence |
| Prisoner Petitions - Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
6
Entry Granting In Forma Pauperis Status, Denying Appointment of Counsel, Dismissing Complaint, and Directing Further Proceedings - The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis, dkt. 3 , is granted. Plaintiff is assessed an initial partial fil ing fee of fifty-one dollars and ninety-three cents ($51.93), which plaintiff is directed to pay to the clerk no later than May 15, 2017. Plaintiff's motion to appoint counsel, dkt. 4 , is denied as premature. Plaintiff's first cla im is therefore dismissed for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. The second claim is dismissed from this action due to improper joinder. Plaintiff shall have through May 15, 2017, in which to notify the Court whether he wish es the Court to sever the second claim into a new action. The Court allows plaintiff through May 15, 2017, to show cause why the complaint should not be dismissed, or to file an amended complaint. (See Entry.) Signed by Judge William T. Lawrence on 4/10/2017. (RSF)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
