HEIRONIMUS v. BROWN
JEFFREY S. HEIRONIMUS |
RICHARD BROWN |
WVCF (Court Use Only) |
2:2017cv00182 |
April 21, 2017 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
Terre Haute Office |
Mark J. Dinsmore |
Jane Magnus-Stinson |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 29 Order Denying Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus and Denying a Certificate of Appealability - Petitioner Jeffrey S. Heironimus is serving an 18-month sentence for a state conviction and a separate 18-year sentence for his 2012 Vanderburgh County, Indiana, conviction for robbery and his adjudication as a habitual offender. The sentences are consecutive. He brings this petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Having applied the appropriate standard of review, a nd having considered the pleadings and the record, Mr. Heironimus' petition for writ of habeas corpus must be denied. Judgment consistent with this Entry shall now issue. Pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 22(b), Rule 11(a) of th e Rules Governing § 2254 proceedings, and 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c), the Court finds that reasonable jurists would not find this Court's "assessment of the constitutional claims debatable or wrong," or would not find it debatable "whether [this Court] was correct in its procedural ruling." The Court therefore denies a certificate of appealability. (See Order.) Signed by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson on 9/13/2018. (DMW) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.