BANKS v. KRUEGER

BANKS v. KRUEGER

Petitioner:	GEORGE BANKS
Respondent:	J. E. KRUEGER
Case Number:	2:2017cv00294
Filed:	June 20, 2017
Court:	US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana
Office:	Terre Haute Office
Presiding Judge:	Mark J. Dinsmore
Presiding Judge:	William T. Lawrence
Nature of Suit:	Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
June 2, 2020	Filing 22 ORDER - The decision and Judgment of May 23, 2018 were correct such that no relief from that Judgment is warranted. The Rule 60(b) motion is DENIED (See Order). Signed by Judge James Patrick Hanlon on 6/2/2020 (Copy mailed per distribution list).(TMC)
May 23, 2018	Filing 11 ENTRY Granting Writ of Habeas Corpus and Directing Entry of Final Judgment - For the reasons explained above, the BOP abused its discretion in denying Mr. Banks's request for a retroactive designation, and his petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241 is therefore granted. The BOP must reconsider Mr. Banks's request for retroactive designation. In considering his request, the BOP shall not invoke any presumption under 18 U.S.C. § 3584(a ) and shall fully evaluate all relevant factors under 18 U.S.C. § 3621 (b) in a fashion consistent with this opinion (SEE ENTRY FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION). Signed by Judge William T. Lawrence on 5/23/2018. Copy to Petitioner via US Mail. (DW)

Date Filed

Document Text

June 2, 2020

Filing 22 ORDER - The decision and Judgment of May 23, 2018 were correct such that no relief from that Judgment is warranted. The Rule 60(b) motion is DENIED (See Order). Signed by Judge James Patrick Hanlon on 6/2/2020 (Copy mailed per distribution list).(TMC)

May 23, 2018

Filing 11 ENTRY Granting Writ of Habeas Corpus and Directing Entry of Final Judgment - For the reasons explained above, the BOP abused its discretion in denying Mr. Banks's request for a retroactive designation, and his petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241 is therefore granted. The BOP must reconsider Mr. Banks's request for retroactive designation. In considering his request, the BOP shall not invoke any presumption under 18 U.S.C. § 3584(a ) and shall fully evaluate all relevant factors under 18 U.S.C. § 3621 (b) in a fashion consistent with this opinion (SEE ENTRY FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION). Signed by Judge William T. Lawrence on 5/23/2018. Copy to Petitioner via US Mail. (DW)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: BANKS v. KRUEGER
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Petitioner: GEORGE BANKS
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Respondent: J. E. KRUEGER
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?