ECHOLS v. ROESSLER et al
| CARL A. ECHOLS |
| C B. MIFFLIN, X ROESSLER and VRZINA |
| 2:2017cv00378 |
| August 7, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
| Terre Haute Office |
| Mark J. Dinsmore |
| Jane Magnus-Stinson |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act |
| Both |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
16
Entry Granting Plaintiff's Request to Incorporate Documents, Granting Defendants' Motion to Dismiss, Denying Pending Motions as Moot, and Directing Entry of Final Judgment - The Court finds that Mr. Echols' complaint fails to stat e a claim upon which relief can be granted, see 28 U.S.C. § 1915A, and accordingly, defendants' motion to dismiss, dkt. 4 , is granted and this action is dismissed. Because Mr. Echols was given notice that the Court intended to treat defendants' motion for screening as a motion to dismiss and called for Mr. Echols to file a response, which he did, no further notice is required before dismissing this action. Final judgment consistent with this Entry shall now enter (SEE ENTRY FOR DETAILS). Copy to Plaintiff via US Mail. Signed by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson on 10/24/2017. (DW)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
