RIGGLEMAN v. KRUEGER et al
ELISHA RIGGLEMAN |
ANY AND ALL JOHN OR JANE DOES INVOLVED, JEFF KRUEGER and MATTHEW TUSSEY |
2:2017cv00380 |
August 7, 2017 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
Terre Haute Office |
Mark J. Dinsmore |
William T. Lawrence |
Prisoner Petitions - Prison Condition |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 141 Entry Granting Motion for Summary Judgment and Directing Entry of Final Judgment - Elisha Riggleman filed this action on August 7, 2017, contending that his constitutional rights were violated while he was incarcerated at the United States Peniten tiary in Terre Haute, Indiana. The defendants move for summary judgment, arguing that Mr. Riggleman failed to exhaust his available administrative remedies as required by the Prison Litigation Reform Act ("PLRA"), 42 U.S.C. § 1997e( a), before filing this lawsuit. It is therefore undisputed that Mr. Riggleman failed to exhaust his available administrative remedies as required by the PLRA before filing this lawsuit. The consequence of these circumstances, in light of 42 U.S.C. § 1997e(a), is that Mr. Riggleman's action should not have been brought and must now be dismissed without prejudice. The defendants' motion for summary judgment, Dkt. No. 135 is granted. Judgment consistent with this Entry shall now issue. (See Entry.) Copy to Plaintiff via U.S. Mail. Signed by Judge William T. Lawrence on 10/15/2018. (DMW) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.