STEWARD v. KANE
| CHRISTOPHER STEWARD |
| BUREAU OF PRISONS and THOMAS R. KANE |
| 2:2017cv00440 |
| September 18, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
| Terre Haute Office |
| Mark J. Dinsmore |
| William T. Lawrence |
| Prisoner Petitions - Prison Condition |
| 05 U.S.C. ยง 702 Administrative Procedure Act |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
3
Entry Addressing Filing Fee, Screening Complaint, and Directing Service of Process - No filing fee was paid with the complaint. Plaintiff shall have through October 26, 2017, in which to either pay the $400.00 filing fee or demonstrate his f inancial ability to do so. The Bureau of Prisons is therefore dismissed from this action. Accordingly, the clerk is directed to update the docket by removing the Bureau of Prisons as a defendant. The clerk is designated, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(c)(2), to issue process to Thomas R. Kane, Acting Director of the Federal Bureau of Prisons. The Marshal for this District or his Deputy shall serve the summons, together with a copy of the complaint (Dkt. No. 1), filed on September 18, 2017, and a copy of this Entry on defendant and on the officials designated pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(i)(2), at the expense of the United States (SEE ENTRY). Copies distributed pursuant to distribution list. Signed by Judge William T. Lawrence on 9/21/2017.(DW)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
