JASKE v. GILMORE et al
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|Date Filed||#||Document Text|
|December 12, 2017
ENTRY Screening Complaint, Dismissing Certain Claims and Defendants, And Directing Issuance and Service of Process - Mr. Jaske's Eighth Amendment deliberate indifference to his serious medical needs claim shall proceed against Dr. Samuel Byrd an d Dr. Naveen Rajoli. The complaint is dismissed as to defendants Kevin Gilmore, Teresa Littlejohn, Esther Hinton, and Linda Vannatta. The clerk is directed to update the docket to reflect that Dr. Samuel Byrd and Dr. Naveen Rajoli are the only defend ants. This discussion of the complaint identifies the only viable claims and defendants. All other claims have been dismissed. Should Mr. Jaske believe the Court has overlooked a claim or defendant, he shall have through January 5, 2017, in which to identify those claims and/or defendants and show why they should be reinstated or added to this action. The clerk is designated pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(c)(3) to issue process to defendants Dr. Samuel Byrd and Dr. Naveen Rajoli in the manner spe cified by Rule 4(d). Process shall consist of the complaint, dkt. 2 , applicable forms (Notice of Lawsuit and Request for Waiver of Service of Summons and Waiver of Service of Summons), and this Entry. See Entry for details. Signed by Judge William T. Lawrence on 12/12/2017 (copies sent pursuant to distribution list).(LBT) Modified on 12/13/2017 to correct typo (LBT).
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?