BOOKER v. COOPER et al
| WILLIE BOOKER |
| ARAMARK and AMBER COOPER |
| PUTNAMVILLE CF (Court Use Only) |
| 2:2018cv00067 |
| February 13, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
| Terre Haute Office |
| William T. Lawrence |
| Doris L. Pryor |
| Prisoner Petitions - Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
7
Entry Discussing Insufficient Claims and Directing Further Proceedings - The plaintiff's motion to proceed in forma pauperis, Dkt. No. 6, is granted. He is assessed an initial partial filing fee of Twenty-Five Dollars and Forty-Six Cents ($25.46). He shall have through April 10, 2018, to pay this sum to the Court. Because the Court has been unable to identify a viable claim for relief against any particular defendant, the complaint is subject to dismissal. The dismissal o f the complaint will not in this instance lead to the dismissal of the action at present. Instead, the plaintiff shall have through April 10, 2018, in which to file an amended complaint. The clerk is directed to include a copy of the priso ner civil rights complaint form along with the plaintiff's copy of this Entry (SEE ENTRY FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION). Signed by Judge William T. Lawrence on 3/12/2018. (Attachments: # 1 copy of the prisoner civil rights complaint form) (DW)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
