KNIGHTEN v. WEXFORD LLC et al
| UNDRAY KNIGHTEN |
| BYRD, DONALDSON, K. HOBSON, F. JEFFERY, S. LANTRIP and WEXFORD LLC |
| 2:2018cv00245 |
| May 30, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
| Terre Haute Office |
| Mark J. Dinsmore |
| Jane Magnus-Stinson |
| Prisoner Petitions - Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
78
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT - granting 68 Motion for Summary Judgment. Judgment consistent with this Order and with the Orders of July 2, 2018, dkt. 12 , and July 20, 2020, dkt. 64 , shall now issue. SEE ORDER. Copy to plaintiff via US Mail. Signed by Judge James Patrick Hanlon on 7/29/2021. (KAA)
|
|
Filing
64
ENTRY GRANTING MEDICAL DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT - The Medical Defendants' motion for summary judgment, dkt. 46 , is GRANTED. The claims against Dr. Byrd and Nurse Hobson are dismissed with prejudice. Consistent with this ruling, the clerk shall terminate Dr. Byrd and Nurse Hobson as defendants. The clerk is directed to update the names of the Medical Defendants' names on the docket to Dr. Samuel Byrd and Nurse Kimberly Hobson. The clerk is directed to update Mr. Knighten's address consistent with the distribution portion of this Entry. No partial final judgment shall issue at this time. Copy to Plaintiff via US Mail. Signed by Judge James Patrick Hanlon on 7/20/2020. (KAA)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
