MCCASTER v. CARTER et al
| CHRISTOPHER JOE MCCASTER |
| DUANE ALSIP, D. ARONLD, LAURA BODKIN, ROBERT CARTER, JR., M. CAYLOR, HUBERT DUNCAN, S. GONZALEZ, KING, L. MASON, MCKINNEY, MYERS, J. REED, J. SCHURMAN, SHAW, A. SMITH, M. STAMPER, TOUKETTE and DUSHAN ZATECKY |
| WVCF (Court Use Only) |
| 2:2018cv00251 |
| June 4, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
| Terre Haute Office |
| William T. Lawrence |
| Doris L. Pryor |
| Prisoner Petitions - Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
150
ORDER DISCUSSING PENDING MOTIONS - 106 Motion for In Camera Review is GRANTED to the extent that the defendants shall have through November 27, 2019, in which to file ex parte the policies requested by the plaintiff. In the future, the def endants should file ex parte disputed discovery with their motion for in camera review or protective order so the Court can address the discovery dispute more efficiently. The defendants shall have through November 27, 2019, in which to file < I>ex parte an unredacted copy of the log data previously produced to the plaintiff. 110 Motion to Compel is DENIED. The Court will review the disputed discovery and determine whether the defendants are entitled to a protective order. 115 Motion for Sanctions is DENIED. On August 19, 2019, the plaintiff filed a motion to compel the production of the defendants' disciplinary history. Dkt. 128 . The defendants shall have through November 27, 2019, in which to either produce the d ocuments requested by the plaintiff or file a motion for protective order. If the defendants move for a protective order, they must file ex parte the disputed discovery materials. 131 Motion for Court Assistance is GRANTED to the extent tha t the Court has addressed his pending motions in this Order. 64 Motion for Settlement Conference is GRANTED. The defendants have indicated that they believe a settlement conference would be beneficial. Dkt. 148 . The Court will set a settlement conference after counsel is recruited for the plaintiff. See Order for details. Signed by Judge James Patrick Hanlon on 11/20/2019. (LBT)
|
|
Filing
53
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION - The Court APPROVES and ADOPTS Magistrate Judge Pryor's Report and Recommendation, dkt. 42 . Plaintiff's motion for preliminary injunction, dkt. 31 , is DENIED. (See Order.) Signed by Judge James Patrick Hanlon on 1/17/2019. (DMW)
|
|
Filing
9
Entry Screening Complaint and Directing Service of Process - Applying the screening standard to the factual allegations in the complaint certain claims are dismissed while other claims shall proceed as submitted. Defendants Zatecky and Bodkin are d ismissed because the complaint contains no factual allegations against them. All claims against Robert Carter, Jr., Duane Alsip, L. Mason, J. Reed, Toukette, and Myers are dismissed. All claims against J. Schurman, A. Smith, King, M. Caylor, H. Du ncan and M. Stamper are dismissed. All claims against D. Arnold are dismissed. If the plaintiff believes that additional claims were alleged in the complaint, but not identified by the Court he shall have through September 12, 2018, in which to id entify those claims. The clerk is designated pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(c) to issue process to the defendants S. Gonzalez, Shaw, and McKinney in the manner specified by Rule 4(d). Process shall consist of the complaint filed on June 4, 2018, a pplicable forms (Notice of Lawsuit and Request for Waiver of Service of Summons and Waiver of Service of Summons), and this Entry. The clerk shall terminate all other defendants from the docket. (See Entry.) Signed by Judge William T. Lawrence on 8/14/2018. (DMW)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
