CARRUTHERS v. SPANENBURG et al
| MICHAEL WAYNE CARRUTHERS |
| CHERL PETTY, RITZ, R. SCHNARR, WILLIAM SPANENBURG and WEXFORD, INC. |
| 2:2018cv00275 |
| June 18, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
| Terre Haute Office |
| William T. Lawrence |
| Doris L. Pryor |
| Prisoner Petitions - Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
53
Order Granting Defendant Cheryl Petty's motion - Motion for summary judgment, dkt. 46 , is granted. All claims against NP Petty are dismissed with prejudice. Because this decision does not resolve all claims in this action, no final judgm ent is necessary at this time. Because defendants Dr. William Spanenburg and Dr. Ritz have not moved for summary judgment, and the dispositive motion deadline has passed, the remaining claims in this action will be resolved by trial or settlement . The Magistrate Judge is requested to hold a status conference at her earliest convenience to determine what remains to be done for trial and to explore the possibility of settlement, conducting a settlement conference as necessary. A date for the final pretrial conference and trial on the merits will be set by separate order. SEE ORDER. Signed by Judge James R. Sweeney II on 3/23/2020. (KAA)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
