GRAHAM v. KRUEGER et al
FREDERICK GRAHAM |
J. BRADLEY, J. E. KRUEGER, MCCOY, NEWLIN, ROBERTSON, G. ROGERS, SHERMAN and C. WINGERD |
2:2018cv00276 |
June 19, 2018 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
Terre Haute Office |
Jane Magnus-Stinson |
Doris L. Pryor |
Prisoner Petitions - Prison Condition |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 86 Order Granting Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment, Denying Plaintiff's Supplemental Motion, and Directing Entry of Final Judgment - Plaintiff Fredrick Graham, an inmate currently incarcerated at the United States Penitentiary in Lewis burg, Pennsylvania, asserts multiple claims based on events that are alleged to have occurred while he was incarcerated at the Federal Correctional Complex in Terre Haute, Indiana (FCC-TH). The defendants seek summary judgment as to all claims, ar guing that Mr. Graham failed to exhaust his available administrative remedies before filing this lawsuit, as required by the Prison Litigation Reform Act (PLRA), 42 U.S.C. § 1997e(a). Mr. Graham has responded to the defendants' motion, a nd the defendants' have submitted a reply. For the following reasons, the motion for summary judgment, dkt. 69 , is granted. This action is dismissed without prejudice. The plaintiff's supplemental motion, dkt. 83 , is denied as moot. Final judgment shall now issue. (See Order.) Copy to plaintiff via US Mail. Signed by Judge James Patrick Hanlon on 10/3/2019. (RSF) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.