CUBLE v. KRUEGER
Petitioner: STEVEN CUBLE
Respondent: JEFFREY E. KRUEGER
Case Number: 2:2018cv00353
Filed: August 10, 2018
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana
Office: Terre Haute Office
Presiding Judge: Mark J Dinsmore
Referring Judge: Jane Magnus-Stinson
2 Judge: James R Sweeney
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 26, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 26, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER - Granting #7 Respondent's motion for a sixty (60) day extension of time to respond to the Petitioner's motion pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2241. The Respondent shall have to and including November 26, 2018, to file its response to the 2241 motion. Copy to Petitioner via U.S. Mail. Signed by Judge James R. Sweeney II on 9/26/2018. (DMW)
September 24, 2018 Filing 8 Reassignment of Case to Judge James R. Sweeney II. Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson is no longer assigned to this case. Please include the new case number ( 2:18-cv-353-JRS-MJD), which includes the initials of the newly assigned judge, on all future filings in this matter. (JD)
September 24, 2018 Filing 7 First MOTION for Extension of Time to November 26, 2018 to file its response to the Petitioner's 2241, filed by Respondent JEFFREY E. KRUEGER. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Reitz, Brian)
September 24, 2018 Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by Brian L. Reitz on behalf of Respondent JEFFREY E. KRUEGER. (Reitz, Brian)
August 20, 2018 Filing 5 CONSENT to Jurisdiction to US Magistrate Judge by STEVEN CUBLE. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(DWH)
August 15, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE - The United States is notified of the filing of the petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2241 and of the supporting memorandum. A copy of this Entry and Order to Show Cause shall be distributed to the United States Attorney. The respondent shall have until September 26, 2018, in which to answer the allegations of the habeas petition, and in doing so shall show cause why the relief sought by the petitioner should not be granted. The petitioner shall have twenty-eight days after service of the answer in which to reply. The petitioner shall have twenty-eight days, in which to either pay the $5.00 filing fee or demonstrate his financial inability to do so. (See Order.) Copy to Petitioner via U.S. Mail. Signed by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson on 8/15/2018.(DMW)
August 13, 2018 Filing 3 MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (DJH)
August 10, 2018 Filing 2 Brief re #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus by STEVEN CUBLE. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(DJH)
August 10, 2018 Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by STEVEN CUBLE. (No fee paid with this filing) (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(DJH)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: CUBLE v. KRUEGER
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: JEFFREY E. KRUEGER
Represented By: Brian L. Reitz
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: STEVEN CUBLE
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?