PETTIS v. JAE
| MALCOLM PETTIS |
| JAE |
| 2:2018cv00428 |
| September 21, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
| James Patrick Hanlon |
| Jane Magnus-Stinson |
| Doris L Pryor |
| Prisoner Petitions - Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 13, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 Reassignment of Case to Judge James Patrick Hanlon. Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson is no longer assigned to this case. Please include the new case number ( 2:18-cv-428-JPH-DLP), which includes the initials of the newly assigned judge, on all future filings in this matter. (CDad) |
Filing 6
FINAL ORDER DIRECTING PLAINTIFF TO PAY FILING FEE - Mr. Pettis shall have through November 27, 2018 to pay the initial partial filing fee. Failure to do so in the time allotted will result in the dismissal of this action without further notice. The clerk is directed to include a copy of dkt. #4 with Mr. Pettis's copy of this Order. (See Order.) Signed by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson on 11/13/2018. (Attachments: #1 Dkt. 4)(DMW)
|
| Filing 5 CONSENT to Prisoner E-Service by MALCOLM PETTIS located at WVCF. Pursuant to General Order 2013-1, documents submitted by MALCOLM PETTIS to the court for filing will generate a Notice of Electronic Filing that will constitute official service upon registered users of CM/ECF. If any parties to the case are not registered CM/ECF users, the Clerk of the Court will mail the document via U.S. Postal Service on behalf of the inmate. NOTE: The E-Filing Program does not affect the obligation of other parties to serve copies of documents in accordance with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (DMW) |
|
Filing 4
Order Granting In Forma Pauperis Status And Directing Payment of Initial Partial Filing Fee - Plaintiff Malcolm Pettis's September 21, 2018, motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis, dkt. #2 , is granted. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(b)(1)(A), an initial partial filing fee of twenty-nine dollars and one cent ($29.01) is assessed and shall be paid to the clerk of the district court no later than October 29, 2018 (SEE ORDER FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION). Signed by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson on 9/28/2018. Copy to Plaintiff via US Mail. (DWH)
|
| Filing 3 MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (DJH) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, filed by Plaintiff MALCOLM PETTIS. (Attachments: #1 inmate trust fund account records)(DJH) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against JAE, filed by MALCOLM PETTIS. (No fee paid with this filing) (DJH) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: PETTIS v. JAE | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: MALCOLM PETTIS | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: JAE | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
