STEVENS v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
| JAN STEVENS |
| UNITED STATES OF AMERICA |
| 2:2018cv00467 |
| October 17, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
| Mark J Dinsmore |
| James Patrick Hanlon |
| Jane Magnus-Stinson |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 11, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 8
ORDER - granting #6 Motion for Extension of Time. Respondent shall have to and including February 5, 2019, to file its response to the 2241 motion. Copy to petitioner via US Mail. Signed by Judge James Patrick Hanlon on 12/11/2018. (RSF) (Main Document 8 replaced on 12/11/2018) (RSF).
|
| Filing 7 RECEIPT #IP063044 for Writ of Habeas Corpus fee in the amount of $5.00, paid by Petitioner. (HET) |
| Filing 6 MOTION for Extension of Time to January 29, 2019 in which to file a response to #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus , filed by Respondent UNITED STATES OF AMERICA. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Reitz, Brian) Modified on 11/28/2018 - added text to title (RSF). |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by Brian L. Reitz on behalf of Respondent UNITED STATES OF AMERICA. (Reitz, Brian) |
| Filing 4 Reassignment of Case to Judge James Patrick Hanlon. Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson is no longer assigned to this case. Please include the new case number ( 2:18-cv-467-JPH-MJD), which includes the initials of the newly assigned judge, on all future filings in this matter. (CDad) |
|
Filing 3
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE - The United States is notified of the filing of the petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2241 and of the supporting memorandum. The respondent shall have until November 30, 2018, in which to answer the allegations of the habeas petition, and in doing so shall show cause why the relief sought by the petitioner should not be granted. The petitioner shall have twenty-eight days after service of the answer in which to reply. The petitioner shall have twenty-eight days, in which to either pay the $5.00 filing fee or demonstrate his financial inability to do so. (See Order.) Copy to Petitioner via U.S. Mail. Signed by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson on 10/22/2018. (DMW)
|
| Filing 2 MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (REO) |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by JAN STEVENS. (No fee paid with this filing) (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(REO) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: STEVENS v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA | |
| Represented By: | Brian L. Reitz |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: JAN STEVENS | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
