WIMBERLY v. FEATHERSTON et al
| JEREMY WIMBERLY |
| MICHELLE ENGLADE, WILLIAM BARLOW, TEXAS REGION EXECUTIVE OFF., DEA AGENT, TEXAS REGION EXECUTIVE U.S. ATTOR., MARGRET SCHMUCKER, ORANGE COUNTY SHERIFF'S MAJOR, TEXAS REGION EXECUTIVE U.S. ATT., ROBERT STRAUSE, BRITT FEATHERSTON, ANTHONY ELYAS, PHILIP SMITH, TRACY SORGE, GARY BONNER, U.S. ATTORNEY, DEWAYNE PERKINS, THOMAS BURBANIC, ORANGE COUNTY SHERIFF'S CAPTAIN and MITCH TEMPLETON |
| 2:2018cv00473 |
| October 22, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
| Jane Magnus-Stinson |
| Doris L Pryor |
| Prisoner Petitions - Prison Condition |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 20, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 NOTICE of Withdrawing Bivins Action, filed by Plaintiff JEREMY WIMBERLY (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (DMW) |
| Filing 7 ENTRY - This action was transferred to the Eastern District of Texas. Case number 1:18-cv-0557 was assigned in that court. The plaintiff's request for documents to file in this action, dkt. #6 , is denied because he should direct his request to the Texas court. The clerk shall include a copy of the docket sheet with the plaintiff's copy of this Entry. Copy to Plaintiff via U.S. Mail. Signed by Magistrate Judge Doris L. Pryor on 11/12/2018. (Attachments: #1 Public Docket Sheet) (DMW) |
| Filing 6 MOTION Requesting Copies, and Change of Address, filed by Plaintiff JEREMY WIMBERLY. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(JDC) |
| Filing 5 Mail Returned as undeliverable. Return to sender, not deliverable as addressed, unable to forward (Victorville US Pent, PO Box 3900, Adelanto, CA 92301) #4 Blank Consent Form sent to JEREMY WIMBERLY. (JDC) |
| The Southern District of Indiana receives email notice from the Clerk of the Eastern District of Texas regarding electronic case transfer. This case was received electronically by the Eastern District of Texas on 10/25/2018 as was assigned case number 1:18-cv-00557 in the receiving court. (DMW) |
| Filing 4 Transfer Letter to Clerk of the Eastern District of Texas. Case transferred electronically to Eastern District of Texas, on October 24, 2018. (DMW) |
Filing 3
CLOSED TRANSFER to Eastern District of Texas - This "Bivens" action was filed in this District on October 22, 2018. The defendants in this action are various individuals who appear to be located in Orange County, Texas. Without having directed the plaintiff to pay the filing fee for this action or demonstrate his inability to do so, the above action is now TRANSFERRED to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Beaumont Division, at Beaumont, Texas. (See Order.) Copy to Plaintiff via U.S. Mail. Signed by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson on 10/24/2018. (DMW)
|
| Filing 2 MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (REO) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against WILLIAM BARLOW, GARY BONNER, THOMAS BURBANIC, ANTHONY ELYAS, MICHELLE ENGLADE, BRITT FEATHERSTON, ONE NAME UNKNOWN, ORANGE COUNTY SHERIFF'S MAJOR, DEWAYNE PERKINS, MARGRET SCHMUCKER, PHILIP SMITH, TRACY SORGE, ROBERT STRAUSE, MITCH TEMPLETON, TEXAS REGION EXECUTIVE OFF., TEXAS REGION EXECUTIVE U.S. ATT.(Director), TEXAS REGION EXECUTIVE U.S. ATT.(Ass. Director), TEXAS REGION EXECUTIVE U.S. ATTOR., U.S. ATTORNEY, filed by JEREMY WIMBERLY. (No fee paid with this filing) (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(REO) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
