PERKINS v. WARDEN
| JEREMY PERKINS |
| WARDEN |
| 2:2018cv00481 |
| October 24, 2018 |
| U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
| Mark J Dinsmore |
| James Patrick Hanlon |
| James R Sweeney |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 20, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 NOTICE of Change of Address for JEREMY PERKINS. Transferred to Thomson, IL. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (RSF) |
| Filing 7 RETURN TO ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE, re #3 Order to Show Cause, filed by WARDEN.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1-Declaration Erickson, #2 Attach 1 - Texas DoC Justice Commitment Inquiry, #3 Attach 2 - State Conviction, #4 Attach 3 - 2013 Federal Indictment, #5 Attach 4 - USM-129 Individual Custody - Detention Rpt, #6 Attach 5 - Supersceding Information, #7 Attach 6 - Federal Conviction, #8 Attach 7 - Detainer, #9 Attach 8 - Excerpt from PS 5880.28 Sentence - Computation Manual, #10 Attach 9 - Public Information Inmate Data)(Langeneckert, Lara) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by Lara K. Langeneckert on behalf of Respondent WARDEN. (Langeneckert, Lara) |
| Filing 5 RECEIPT #IP063082 for Habeas filing fee in the amount of $5.00, paid by Petitioner. (REO) |
| Filing 4 Reassignment of Case to Judge James Patrick Hanlon. Judge James R. Sweeney II is no longer assigned to this case. Please include the new case number ( 2:18-cv-481-JPH-MJD), which includes the initials of the newly assigned judge, on all future filings in this matter. (NRad) |
Filing 3
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE - The United States is notified of the filing of the petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2241 and of the supporting memorandum. The respondent shall have until December 10, 2018, in which to answer the allegations of the habeas petition, and in doing so shall show cause why the relief sought by the petitioner should not be granted. The petitioner shall have twenty-eight days after service of the answer in which to reply. The petitioner shall have twenty-eight days, in which to either pay the $5.00 filing fee or demonstrate his financial inability to do so. (See Order.) Copy to Petitioner via U.S. Mail. Signed by Judge James R. Sweeney II on 10/31/2018. (DMW)
|
| Filing 2 MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (REO) |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by JEREMY PERKINS. (No fee paid with this filing) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit - Sentence Monitoring Computation Data, #2 Envelope)(REO) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: PERKINS v. WARDEN | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: JEREMY PERKINS | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: WARDEN | |
| Represented By: | Lara K. Langeneckert |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
