BURRESS et al v. BUESING et al
| Schomburg & Schomburg Construction, Inc., Wesley Burress Trust, Mr WESLEY BURRESS and WESLEY BURRESS |
| Mrs JULIE BUESING, Butch Buesing and JULIE BUESING |
| SCHOMBURG & SCHOMBURG CONTRUCTION, INC. |
| 2:2018cv00517 |
| November 28, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
| Mark J Dinsmore |
| James Patrick Hanlon |
| Jane Magnus-Stinson |
| Doris L Pryor |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 25, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 24 REPLY in Support of Motion re #15 MOTION to Remand , filed by Plaintiff WESLEY BURRESS, Interested Party SCHOMBURG & SCHOMBURG CONTRUCTION, INC.. (Neibarger, Gregory) |
| Filing 23 RESPONSE in Opposition re #15 MOTION to Remand , filed by Defendants BUTCH BUESING, JULIE BUESING. (Barr, Matthew) |
Filing 22
ORDER SETTING INITIAL PRETRIAL CONFERENCE: Initial Pretrial Conference set for 4/11/2019 at 2:30 PM (Eastern Time) in room #255, United States Courthouse, 46 E. Ohio Street, Indianapolis, Indiana before Magistrate Judge Doris L. Pryor. (See Order for additional information and deadlines.) Signed by Magistrate Judge Doris L. Pryor on 1/11/2019. (DMW)
|
|
Filing 21
ORDER granting #20 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response to #9 MOTION to Dismiss - In the event that the Court finds that Mr. Burress' Motion for Remand should be denied, Mr. Burress must file a response to the Motion to Dismiss no later than twenty-one (21) days after the date of the Court's order denying the Motion for Remand. Signed by Judge James Patrick Hanlon on 12/28/2018. (JRB)
|
| Filing 20 First MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response to TBD re #9 MOTION to Dismiss , filed by Plaintiff WESLEY BURRESS. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Burress, Joshua) |
|
Filing 19
ORDER granting #17 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response to #15 MOTION to Remand to 1/18/19. Signed by Judge James Patrick Hanlon on 12/27/2018. (JRB)
|
| Filing 18 AFFIDAVIT of Service upon Julie Buesing, and Butch Buesing by All Plaintiffs. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Neibarger, Gregory) Modified on 12/27/2018 - edited docket text to include defendants' names(RSF). |
| Filing 17 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response to 1/18/2019 re #15 MOTION to Remand , filed by Defendants BUTCH BUESING, JULIE BUESING. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Correspondence Between Counsel, #2 Text of Proposed Order)(Orlowski, Alexander) |
| Filing 16 BRIEF/MEMORANDUM in Support re #15 MOTION to Remand , filed by Plaintiff WESLEY BURRESS. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A--Original state court summonses and related certified mail materials, #2 Exhibit B--Nov. 21, 2018 letter to Buesing and counsel regarding state court process/pleadings, #3 Exhibit C--Dec. 4, 2018 letter to Buesing providing notice of wrongful removal and seeking remand, #4 Exhibit D--Dec. 5, 2018 letter from Buesing rejecting request for voluntary remand, #5 Exhibit E--Dec 11, 2018 letter to Buesing acknowledging refusal to voluntarily remand)(Burress, Joshua) |
| Filing 15 MOTION to Remand , filed by Plaintiff WESLEY BURRESS. (Burress, Joshua) |
| Filing 14 Summons Issued as to JULIE BUESING. (DMW) |
| Filing 13 Summons Issued as to BUTCH BUESING. (DMW) |
| Filing 12 Proposed Summons submitted for issuance by the clerk as to JULIE BUESING. (Neibarger, Gregory) Modified on 12/17/2018 to correct docket text (DMW). |
| Filing 11 Proposed Summons submitted for issuance by the clerk as to BUTCH BUESING. (Neibarger, Gregory) Modified on 12/17/2018 to correct docket text (DMW). |
| Filing 10 BRIEF/MEMORANDUM in Support re #9 MOTION to Dismiss , filed by Defendants BUTCH BUESING, JULIE BUESING. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Neibarger Letter, #2 Exhibit B - Barr Letter)(Barr, Matthew) |
| Filing 9 MOTION to Dismiss , filed by Defendants BUTCH BUESING, JULIE BUESING. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Barr, Matthew) |
| Filing 8 DEMAND for Trial by Jury, filed by Plaintiff WESLEY BURRESS. (Neibarger, Gregory) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Reassignment of Case to Judge James Patrick Hanlon and Magistrate Judge Doris L. Pryor. Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson and Magistrate Judge Mark J. Dinsmore are no longer assigned to this case. Please include the new case number, 2:18-cv-00517-JPH-DLP, on all future filings in this matter. (RSF) |
|
Filing 6
ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Clerk is directed to reassign case to Judge James P. Hanlon and Magistrate Judge Doris L. Pryor for all further proceedings. This case is related to 2:18-cv-00358-JPH-DLP. Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson and Magistrate Judge Mark J. Dinsmore no longer assigned to case. Signed by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson on 11/30/2018. (MRI)
|
| Filing 5 PROCEDURES AND PRACTICES before Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson. (RSF) |
| Filing 4 MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (RSF) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by Alexander Pape Orlowski on behalf of Defendants JULIE BUESING, Butch Buesing. (Orlowski, Alexander) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by Matthew B. Barr on behalf of Defendants JULIE BUESING, Butch Buesing. (Barr, Matthew) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Vermillion Circuit Court, case number 83C01-181-CT-000014, filed by JULIE BUESING, Butch Buesing. (Filing fee $400, receipt number 0756-5173575) (Attachments: #1 State Court Record (Complaint, Alias Summonses, Appearance) - Exhibit A, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(Barr, Matthew) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
