THURSTON v. WARDEN
| RICKY J. THURSTON |
| WARDEN |
| 2:2018cv00525 |
| December 6, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
| Mark J Dinsmore |
| James R Sweeney |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 1, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 First MOTION for Extension of Time to March 11, 2019 in which to #3 Order to Show Cause (State Conviction) , filed by Respondent WARDEN. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Roebel, Justin) |
| Filing 8 RECEIPT #IP063525 for Writ of Habeas Corpus fee in the amount of $5.00, paid by Petitioner. (HET) |
Filing 7
Order Denying Motion to Appoint Counsel - Petitioner's motion to appoint counsel, dkt. #6 , is therefore denied without prejudice. (See Order.) Copy to Petitioner via U.S. Mail. Signed by Judge James R. Sweeney II on 12/21/2018. (DMW)
|
| Filing 6 MOTION for Appointment of Counsel, filed by Petitioner RICKY J. THURSTON. (DMW) |
| Filing 5 CONSENT to Jurisdiction to US Magistrate Judge by RICKY J. THURSTON. (DMW) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by Justin F. Roebel on behalf of Respondent WARDEN. (Roebel, Justin) |
|
Filing 3
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE (State Conviction) - Ricky J. Thurston's petition for a writ of habeas corpus challenges the petitioner's conviction and sentence in Indiana state court case number 49G01-1103-FA-014461. Petitioner shall have through January 10, 2019, in which to either pay the $5.00 filing fee for this action or demonstrate his/her financial inability to do so. Respondent is ORDERED to enter an appearance by December 20, 2018. If respondent argues that all claims in the petition are subject to one of the procedural bars for dismissal outlined in Rule 5(b), respondent is ORDERED to file a motion to dismiss based on a complete procedural bar by January 22, 2019. If Track 1 does not apply, respondent is ORDERED to answer the petition by February 11, 2019. The Court does not anticipate extending respondent's deadlines absent respondent specifically setting forth extraordinary circumstances. (SEE ORDER FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION AND DEADLINES) Copy to petitioner via US Mail. Signed by Judge James R. Sweeney II on 12/11/2018.(RSF)
|
| Filing 2 MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (REO) |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by RICKY J. THURSTON. (No fee paid with this filing) (Attachments: #1 Cover page)(REO) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: THURSTON v. WARDEN | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: WARDEN | |
| Represented By: | Justin F. Roebel |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: RICKY J. THURSTON | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
