CHAPPELLE v. WILSON et al
| DON CHAPPELLE |
| WILLIAM E. WILSON and DAVID LUKENS |
| 2:2018cv00540 |
| December 13, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
| Mark J Dinsmore |
| James Patrick Hanlon |
| Prisoner Petitions - Prison Condition |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 7, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 4
ORDER DIRECTING FURTHER PROCEEDINGS - The plaintiff shall have through February 28, 2019, to pay the filing fee or explain why doing so is not possible. The failure to do so by this date will result in the dismissal of this action without further warning. (See Order.) Copy to Plaintiff via U.S. Mail. Signed by Judge James Patrick Hanlon on 2/7/2019. (DMW)
|
| Filing 3 ENTRY DIRECTING FURTHER PROCEEDINGS - The plaintiff shall have through January 14, 2019, in which to either pay the $400.00 filing fee for this action or demonstrate that he lacks the financial ability to do so. (See Entry.) Copy to Plaintiff via U.S. Mail. Signed by Judge James Patrick Hanlon on 12/17/2018. (DMW) |
| Filing 2 MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (HET) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against DAVID LUKENS, WILLIAM E. WILSON, filed by DON CHAPPELLE. (No fee paid with this filing) (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(HET) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
