BARNETT v. BROWN
Petitioner: REYMOND BARNETT
Respondent: RICHARD DICK BROWN
Case Number: 2:2019cv00024
Filed: January 14, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana
Presiding Judge: Mark J Dinsmore
Referring Judge: James R Sweeney
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on June 3, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
February 28, 2019 Filing 11 Respondent's Notice of 42-day Extension of Deadline to File a Return to Order Show Cause, filed by RICHARD DICK BROWN. Return to Order to Show Cause deadline is 4/11/2019. (Swinney, Josiah)
February 22, 2019 Filing 10 NOTICE of Appearance by Patricia Caress McMath on behalf of Respondent RICHARD DICK BROWN. (McMath, Patricia)
February 22, 2019 Filing 9 NOTICE of Appearance by Josiah Swinney on behalf of Respondent RICHARD DICK BROWN. (Swinney, Josiah)
February 4, 2019 Filing 8 RECEIPT #IP063822 for Writ of Habeas Corpus fee in the amount of $5.00, paid by Petitioner. (HET)
January 29, 2019 Filing 7 NOTICE of Inmate Account Transaction re: Filing Fee, filed by Petitioner REYMOND BARNETT (JRB)
January 29, 2019 Filing 6 CONSENT to Jurisdiction to US Magistrate Judge by REYMOND BARNETT. (JRB)
January 17, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE (Discipline Case) - Reymond Barnett's petition for a writ of habeas corpus challenges his disciplinary conviction in disciplinary case number IYC 17-03-0079. The petitioner shall have through February 15, 2019, in which to either pay the $5.00 filing fee for this action or demonstrate his financial inability to do so. The custodian of petitioner is directed to answer the allegations of the petition for a writ of habeas corpus and in doing so shall show cause why the relief sought by the petitioner should not be granted. This shall be done within forty-two (42) days of the date this Entry is signed. The petitioner shall have twenty-eight (28) days after service of such answer or return to order to show cause on him in which to reply. (See Order.) (Show Cause Response due by 2/28/2019.) Copy to Petitioner via U.S. Mail. Signed by Judge James R. Sweeney II on 1/17/2019. (DMW)
January 14, 2019 Filing 4 MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (REO)
January 14, 2019 Filing 3 MOTION for Habeas Corpus, filed by Petitioner REYMOND BARNETT. (REO)
January 14, 2019 Filing 2 Memorandum in Support of #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus by REYMOND BARNETT. (REO)
January 14, 2019 Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by REYMOND BARNETT. (No fee paid with this filing) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit)(REO)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: BARNETT v. BROWN
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: REYMOND BARNETT
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: RICHARD DICK BROWN
Represented By: Josiah Swinney
Represented By: Patricia Caress McMath
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?