MARCHANT v. NATALIE et al
AUTUMN MARCHANT |
VANCE RAHAM, T. AULER, CHARLENE BURKETT, MICHAEL NATALIE, G. PINKSTON, THOMAS HOBBS and KRISTA COX |
2:2019cv00093 |
February 20, 2019 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
Doris L Pryor |
James R Sweeney |
Prisoner Petitions - Prison Condition |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 20, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 12 RECEIPT #IP064699 for partial filing fee in the amount of $10.00, paid by Plaintiff. (DJH) |
Filing 11 Documents for Service by IDOC upon CHARLENE BURKETT - re #1 Complaint, #8 Order, #9 NOTICE of Lawsuit & Request for Waiver of Service of Summons Issued by Clerk. (MAT) |
Filing 10 ORDER - In her motion filed on March 21, 2019, plaintiff Autumn Marchant requests a form motion for assistance with recruiting counsel. That request, dkt. #7 , is granted. The clerk shall include a form motion with Marchant's copy of this Order. Signed by Judge James R. Sweeney II on 3/25/2019. Copy sent to plaintiff via US Mail. (MAT) |
Filing 9 NOTICE of Lawsuit & Request for Waiver of Service of Summons Issued by Clerk as to MICHAEL NATALIE, T. AULER, THOMAS HOBBS, and CHARLENE BURKETT. (MAT) |
Filing 8 ORDER Screening Complaint and Directing Issuance of Service - This summary of claims includes all of the viable claims identified by the Court. All other claims have been dismissed. If the plaintiff believes that additional claims were alleged in the complaint, but not identified by the Court, she shall have through April 23, 2019, in which to identify those claims. Based on the foregoing, the clerk shall terminate Krista Cox, Vance Raham, and G. Pinkston as defendants. The clerk is directed pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(c)(3) to issue process to defendants Natalie, Auler, Hobbs, and Burkett in the manner specified by Rule 4(d). Process shall consist of the complaint, applicable forms (Notice of Lawsuit and Request for Wavier of Service of Summons and Waiver of Service of Summons), and this Entry. See Order for details. Signed by Judge James R. Sweeney II on 3/25/2019. Copy sent to plaintiff via US Mail. (MAT) |
Filing 7 MOTION to Appoint Counsel, filed by Plaintiff AUTUMN MARCHANT. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(MAT) |
Filing 6 RECEIPT #IP064311 for Partial fee in the amount of $100.00, paid by Plaintiff. (HET) |
Filing 5 Correspondence REQUESTING COPY of Case Docket and Document(s) re #1 Complaint, filed by AUTUMN MARCHANT. Copies provided via US Mail. (Attachments: #1 Public Docket Sheet, #2 Dkt. 1, #3 Envelope) (DMW) |
Filing 4 Order on Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis - The plaintiff's motion to proceed in forma pauperis, dkt. #2 , is granted to the extent that the plaintiff is assessed an initial partial filing fee of Sixty-Two Dollars and Fifty-Six Cents ($62.56). The plaintiff shall have through March 25, 2019, in which to pay this sum to the clerk of the district court. Copy to Plaintiff via U.S. Mail. Signed by Judge James R. Sweeney II on 2/26/2019. (DMW) |
Filing 3 MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (DJH) |
Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Plaintiff, AUTUMN MARCHANT. (Attachments: #1 Transaction History, #2 Envelope)(DJH) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against T. AULER, CHARLENE BURKETT, KRISTA COX, THOMAS HOBBS, MICHAEL NATALIE, G. PINKSTON, VANCE RAHAM, filed by AUTUMN MARCHANT. (No fee paid with this filing) (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(DJH) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.