STINE et al v. KRUGER et al
| MIKEAL GLENN STINE, SIDNEY GRIFFIN and DONALD NICHOLS |
| USP-TERRE HAUTE/HEALTH SERVICES DIVISION AND UNKNOWN STAFF (DOCTORS) AND (PHYSICIANS ASSISTANTS), A. SPRINGER, KRUGER, JOHN AND JANE DOES, J. DODGE, SHOEMAKER, JOHN O'BRIEN, UNDERWOOD, J. WATSON, FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, USP-TERRE HAUTE FOOD SERVICE AND UNKNOWN JOHN AND JANE DOES OF STATED: and H. HURWITZ |
| 2:2019cv00121 |
| March 12, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
| Mark J Dinsmore |
| James Patrick Hanlon |
| Prisoner Petitions - Prison Condition |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 12, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (DJH) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order, MOTION for Preliminary Injunction, filed by Plaintiffs SIDNEY GRIFFIN, DONALD NICHOLS, and MIKEAL GLENN STINE. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(DJH) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against J. DODGE, JOHN AND JANE DOES, FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, H. HURWITZ, KRUGER, JOHN O'BRIEN, SHOEMAKER, A. SPRINGER, UNDERWOOD, USP-TERRE HAUTE FOOD SERVICE AND UNKNOWN JOHN AND JANE DOES OF STATED:, USP-TERRE HAUTE/HEALTH SERVICES DIVISION AND UNKNOWN STAFF (DOCTORS) AND (PHYSICIANS ASSISTANTS), filed by SIDNEY GRIFFIN, DONALD NICHOLS, and MIKEAL GLENN STINE. (No fee paid with this filing) (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(DJH) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
