SWAIN v. SAUL
| BEVERLY SWAIN |
| NANCY A. BERRYHILL and ANDREW M. SAUL |
| 2:2019cv00152 |
| April 1, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
| Mark J Dinsmore |
| Jane Magnus-Stinson |
| Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 27, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 10
ORDER - granting #9 Unopposed First Motion to Extend Deadline to Submit Brief in Support of Plaintiff's Complaint Seeking Judicial Review. Plaintiff's time in which to file her Brief in Support of her Complaint requesting review and remand of the Commissioner of Social Security's Final Decision is EXTENDED to and including Thursday, August 1, 2019. Signed by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson on 6/27/2019. (DMW)
|
| Filing 9 First MOTION for Extension of Time to 08/01/2019 to File Brief in Support of Complaint (Unopposed), filed by Plaintiff BEVERLY SWAIN. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(de la Torre, Adriana) |
|
Filing 8
ORDER - Plaintiff seeks judicial review of the defendant Commissioner's denial of Plaintiff's claim for Social Security benefits based on disability. Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 16, the Court now enters the following orders. (See Order for additional information and deadlines.) Signed by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson on 6/4/2019. (DMW)
|
| Filing 7 TRANSCRIPT of Administrative Record of Social Security Administration, by NANCY A. BERRYHILL. (Attachments: #1 court transcript index, #2 administrative documents, #3 payment documents, #4 jurisdictional documents, #5 non disability related documents, #6 disability related documents, #7 medical records part 1, #8 medical records part 2)(Wierenga, Julian) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by Julian Clifford Wierenga on behalf of Defendant NANCY A. BERRYHILL. (Wierenga, Julian) |
| Filing 5 ENTRY - Plaintiff's Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis, [Filing No. #2 ], is GRANTED. Immediate payment is not required. However, the $350 balance remains owing. (See Entry.) Copy via U.S. Mail pursuant to distribution list. Signed by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson on 4/2/2019. (DMW) |
| Filing 4 MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (DMW) |
| (TEXT ONLY ENTRY) CLERK'S NOTICE - Pursuant to Local Rule 5-12(a), and by agreement with the United States Attorney, no actual service of initial process is required in Social Security appeals brought in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Indiana, unless otherwise ordered. The Social Security Administration will treat notification through the Court's Case Management and Electronic Filing System (CM/ECF) as service under Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Therefore, the Clerk's Office will refrain from issuance of the submitted summons(es) unless otherwise ordered. (TEXT-ENTRY: There is no pdf document associated with this entry.) (DMW) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by Adriana Maria de la Torre on behalf of Plaintiff BEVERLY SWAIN. (de la Torre, Adriana) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis , filed by Plaintiff BEVERLY SWAIN. (de la Torre, Adriana) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Seeking Judicial Review against NANCY A. BERRYHILL, filed by BEVERLY SWAIN. (No fee paid with this filing) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons)(de la Torre, Adriana) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
