BATISTA v. WATSON
| HECTOR BATISTA |
| T. J. WATSON |
| 2:2019cv00170 |
| April 8, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
| Mark J Dinsmore |
| James R Sweeney |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 3, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 FINAL JUDGMENT - The Court now enters FINAL JUDGMENT. Mr. Batista's petition for writ of habeas corpus is denied and the action is dismissed with prejudice. Copy to Petitioner via U.S. Mail. Signed by Judge James R. Sweeney II on 6/3/2019. (DMW) |
Filing 7
Order Denying Writ of Habeas Corpus Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2241 and Directing Entry of Final Judgment - Hector Batista, an inmate at the United States Penitentiary--Terre Haute ("USP-TH"), seeks a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2241. Mr. Batista's petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2241 is denied. The dismissal of this action is with prejudice. Judgment consistent with this Order shall now issue. (See Order.) Copy to Petitioner via U.S. Mail. Signed by Judge James R. Sweeney II on 6/3/2019. (DMW)
|
| Filing 6 RECEIPT #IP064903 for filing fee in the amount of $5.00, paid by Petitioner. (DJH) |
| Filing 5 RETURN TO ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE, re #3 Order to Show Cause, filed by T. J. WATSON.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1- Shalburg Declaration with Attachments)(Langeneckert, Lara) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by Lara K. Langeneckert on behalf of Respondent T. J. WATSON. (Langeneckert, Lara) |
|
Filing 3
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE - The United States is notified of the filing of the petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2241 and of the supporting memorandum. The respondent shall have until April 30, 2019 in which to answer the allegations of the habeas petition, and in doing so shall show cause why the relief sought by the petitioner should not be granted. The petitioner shall have twenty-eight days after service of the answer in which to reply. The petitioner shall have twenty-eight days, in which to either pay the $5.00 filing fee or demonstrate his financial inability to do so. (See Order.) Copy to Petitioner via U.S. Mail. Signed by Judge James R. Sweeney II on 4/9/2019. (DMW)
|
| Filing 2 MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (REO) |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by HECTOR BATISTA. (No fee paid with this filing) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit - Sentencing Computation Data, #2 Envelope)(REO) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: BATISTA v. WATSON | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: HECTOR BATISTA | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: T. J. WATSON | |
| Represented By: | Lara K. Langeneckert |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
