LOWE v. WARDEN
| EDDIE LOWE |
| WARDEN |
| 2:2019cv00177 |
| April 12, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
| Jane Magnus-Stinson |
| Doris L Pryor |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 7, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 RETURN TO ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE, re #4 Order to Show Cause (Disciplinary), filed by WARDEN.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Report of Conduct, #2 Exhibit A-1 - Telephone Log, #3 Exhibit A-2 - Offender Account Inquiry, #4 Exhibit A-3 - W-2 Form, #5 Exhibit A-4 - Letters, #6 Exhibit B - Screening Report, #7 Exhibit B-1 - Notice to Lay Advocate, #8 Exhibit B-2 - Continuance, #9 Exhibit C - Report of Disciplinary Hearing, #10 Exhibit D - Disciplinary Hearing Appeal, #11 Exhibit E - Final Reviewing Authority, #12 Exhibit F - List of Offenses, #13 Exhibit G - Trust Fund Policy)(Talbot, Monika) |
| Filing 7 Respondent's Notice of 42-day Extension of Deadline to File a Return to Order Show Cause, filed by WARDEN. Return to Order to Show Cause deadline is 7/9/2019. (Talbot, Monika) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by Monika P. Talbot on behalf of Respondent WARDEN. (Talbot, Monika) |
| Filing 5 RECEIPT #IP065096 for Writ of Habeas Corpus fee in the amount of $5.00, paid by Petitioner. (HET) |
Filing 4
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE (Discipline Case) - Eddie Lowe's petition for a writ of habeas corpus challenges his disciplinary conviction in disciplinary case number WVE 18-08-122 on September 11, 2018. The petitioner shall have through May 16, 2019, in which to either pay the $5.00 filing fee for this action or demonstrate his financial inability to do so. The custodian of petitioner is directed to answer the allegations of the petition for a writ of habeas corpus and in doing so shall show cause why the relief sought by the petitioner should not be granted. Show Cause Response due by 5/28/2019. (See Order.) Copy to Petitioner via U.S. Mail. Signed by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson on 4/16/2019. (DMW)
|
| Filing 3 MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (REO) |
| Filing 2 BRIEF/MEMORANDUM in Support, re #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by Petitioner EDDIE LOWE. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit - Disciplinary documents)(REO) |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by EDDIE LOWE. (No fee paid with this filing) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit - Disciplinary documents)(REO) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: LOWE v. WARDEN | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: WARDEN | |
| Represented By: | Monika P. Talbot |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: EDDIE LOWE | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
