DORRIS v. SAUL
Plaintiff: KAREN C. DORRIS
Defendant: NANCY A. BERRYHILL and ANDREW M. SAUL
Case Number: 2:2019cv00181
Filed: April 16, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana
Presiding Judge: James Patrick Hanlon
Referring Judge: Doris L Pryor
Nature of Suit: Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 205
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on June 20, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
June 20, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER - Plaintiff seeks judicial review of Defendant Commissioner's denial of Plaintiff's claim for Social Security benefits based on disability. Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 16, the Court now enters the following orders. (See Order for additional information and deadlines.) Signed by Judge James Patrick Hanlon on 6/20/2019. (DMW)
June 18, 2019 Filing 6 TRANSCRIPT of Administrative Record of Social Security Administration, by ANDREW M. SAUL. (Attachments: #1 court transcript index, #2 administrative documents 12.6.15, #3 payment documents 12.6.15, #4 jurisdictional documents 12.6.15, #5 non disability related documents 12.6.15, #6 disability related documents 12.6.15, #7 medical records part 1 12.6.15, #8 medical records part 2 12.6.15, #9 medical records part 3 12.6.15, #10 medical records part 4 12.6.15, #11 medical records part 5 12.6.15, #12 medical records part 6 12.6.15, #13 administrative documents 5.18.19, #14 payment documents 5.18.19, #15 jurisdictional documents 5.18.19, #16 non disability related documents 5.18.19, #17 disability related documents 5.18.19, #18 medical records part 1 5.18.19, #19 medical records part 2 5.18.19, #20 medical records part 3 5.18.19)(Wierenga, Julian)
June 18, 2019 Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by Julian Clifford Wierenga on behalf of Defendant ANDREW M. SAUL. (Wierenga, Julian)
April 16, 2019 Filing 4 MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (DMW)
April 16, 2019 Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by Joseph R. Wambach on behalf of Plaintiff KAREN C. DORRIS. (Wambach, Joseph)
April 16, 2019 Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by Matthew Frederick Richter on behalf of Plaintiff KAREN C. DORRIS. (Richter, Matthew)
April 16, 2019 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against NANCY A. BERRYHILL, filed by KAREN C. DORRIS. (Filing fee $400, receipt number 0756-5384151) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Richter, Matthew)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: DORRIS v. SAUL
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: KAREN C. DORRIS
Represented By: Matthew Frederick Richter
Represented By: Joseph R. Wambach
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: NANCY A. BERRYHILL
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: ANDREW M. SAUL
Represented By: Julian Clifford Wierenga
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?