MIDDLETON v. PLAINFIELD CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
Plaintiff: JASON MICHAEL MIDDLETON
Defendant: PLAINFIELD CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
Case Number: 2:2019cv00211
Filed: May 2, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana
Presiding Judge: James Patrick Hanlon
Referring Judge: Doris L Pryor
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Prison Condition
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on June 28, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
June 28, 2019 Filing 7 ENTRY - The plaintiff's motion for court assistance, dkt. #6 , is granted to the extent that: a) a screening and show-cause Entry was issued on June 17, 2019, and b) his case was filed in the Terre Haute Division because he was confined at the Putnamville Correctional Facility at the time it was filed. The clerk is requested to include a copy of the docket sheet with the plaintiff's copy of this Entry. Copy to plaintiff via US Mail. Signed by Judge James Patrick Hanlon on 6/28/2019. (Attachments: #1 Docket Sheet) (RSF)
June 24, 2019 Filing 6 MOTION for Court Assistance, filed by Plaintiff JASON MICHAEL MIDDLETON. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(DMW)
June 17, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ENTRY SCREENING AND DISMISSING COMPLAINT AND DIRECTING PLAINTIFF TO SHOW CAUSE - Mr. Middleton's complaint must be dismissed for the reasons set forth above. He shall have through July 15, 2019, in which to show cause why Final Judgment consistent with this Entry should not issue. Any amended complaint would completely replace the original complaint and therefore must be complete. If Mr. Middleton fails to respond to this order to show cause, the case will be dismissed in accordance with 28 U.S.C. 1915A(b) for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted without further notice. This dismissal will count as a "strike" under 1915(g). (See Entry.) Copy to Plaintiff via U.S. Mail Signed by Judge James Patrick Hanlon on 6/17/2019. (DMW)
May 10, 2019 Filing 4 ENTRY GRANTING MOTION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS - The plaintiff's motion to proceed in forma pauperis, dkt. #2 , is granted. No initial partial filing fee is due at this time. (See Entry.) Copy to Plaintiff via U.S. Mail. Signed by Judge James Patrick Hanlon on 5/10/2019. (DMW)
May 2, 2019 Filing 3 MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (REO)
May 2, 2019 Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, filed by Plaintiff JASON MICHAEL MIDDLETON. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit of Indigency, #2 Envelope)(REO)
May 2, 2019 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against PLAINFIELD CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, filed by JASON MICHAEL MIDDLETON. (No fee paid with this filing) (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(REO)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: MIDDLETON v. PLAINFIELD CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: JASON MICHAEL MIDDLETON
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: PLAINFIELD CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?