YOUNG v. KNOX COUNTY LAW ENFORCEMENT CENTER
Plaintiff: MARION L. YOUNG
Defendant: KNOX COUNTY LAW ENFORCEMENT CENTER
Case Number: 2:2019cv00275
Filed: June 11, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana
Presiding Judge: James Patrick Hanlon
Referring Judge: Doris L Pryor
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 4, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
July 26, 2019 Filing 9 AMENDED COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by MARION L. YOUNG. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(DMW)
July 17, 2019 Filing 8 ENTRY DISMISSING COMPLAINT AND DIRECTING FILING OF AMENDED COMPLAINT - The Court has been unable to identify a viable claim for relief against the sole defendant, the complaint is subject to dismissal. The dismissal of the complaint will not in this instance lead to the dismissal of the action. Instead, the plaintiff shall have through August 21, 2019, to file an amended complaint. The clerk is directed to include a copy of the prisoner civil rights complaint form along with the plaintiff's copy of this Entry. (See Entry.) Copy to plaintiff via US Mail. Signed by Judge James Patrick Hanlon on 7/17/2019. (Attachments: #1 Complaint Form)(RSF)
July 17, 2019 Filing 7 MOTION to Appoint Counsel, filed by Plaintiff MARION L. YOUNG. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(DMW)
July 15, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER ON IN FORMA PAUPERIS STATUS - The plaintiff's renewed motion to proceed in forma pauperis, dkt. #5 , is granted. No initial partial filing fee is due at this time. (See Order.) Copy to Plaintiff via US Mail. Signed by Judge James Patrick Hanlon on 7/15/2019. (DMW)
July 2, 2019 Filing 5 RESPONSE, re #4 ORDER DIRECTING FURTHER PROCEEDINGS, filed by Plaintiff MARION L. YOUNG. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(DMW)
June 19, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER DIRECTING FURTHER PROCEEDINGS - The plaintiff's motion to proceed in forma pauperis, dkt. #2 , is DENIED as presented. He shall have until July 14, 2019, in which to renew his motion to proceed in forma pauperis by attaching a copy of the transactions associated with his institution trust account for the 6-month period preceding the filing of this action on June 10, 2019. (See Order.) Copy to Plaintiff via US Mail. Signed by Judge James Patrick Hanlon on 6/19/2019. (DMW)
June 11, 2019 Filing 3 MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (JRB)
June 10, 2019 Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, filed by Plaintiff MARION L. YOUNG. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(JRB)
June 10, 2019 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against KNOX COUNTY LAW ENFORCEMENT CENTER, filed by MARION L. YOUNG. (No fee paid with this filing) (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(JRB)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: YOUNG v. KNOX COUNTY LAW ENFORCEMENT CENTER
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: MARION L. YOUNG
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: KNOX COUNTY LAW ENFORCEMENT CENTER
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?