DUMES v. BROWN et al
| WILLIE DUMES |
| K. WATTS, R. BROWN, K. GILMORE, MILLER, S. FISCHER, F. LITTLEJOHN and DONALDSON |
| 2:2019cv00286 |
| June 14, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
| Mark J Dinsmore |
| Jane Magnus-Stinson |
| Prisoner Petitions - Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 16, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 13
Letter to the Court re Filing Fee, filed by Plaintiff WILLIE DUMES. (DMW)
|
|
Filing 12
NOTICE of Change of Address for WILLIE DUMES to Pendleton, IN. (DMW)
|
|
Filing 11
CONSENT to Prisoner E-Service by WILLIE DUMES located at PENDLETON CF. Pursuant to General Order 2013-1, documents submitted by WILLIE DUMES to the court for filing will generate a Notice of Electronic Filing that will constitute official service upon registered users of CM/ECF. If any parties to the case are not registered CM/ECF users, the Clerk of the Court will mail the document via U.S. Postal Service on behalf of the inmate. NOTE: The E-Filing Program does not affect the obligation of other parties to serve copies of documents in accordance with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (DMW)
|
|
Filing 10
NOTICE of Change of Address for WILLIE DUMES to Pendleton, IN. (DMW)
|
|
Filing 9
Mail Returned as undeliverable. 7 Receipt sent to WILLIE DUMES at WVCF via E-Service. (DMW)
|
|
Filing 8
NOTICE of Change of Address for WILLIE DUMES to Pendleton, IN. WILLIE DUMES is no longer participating in E-Service. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (DMW)
|
|
Filing 7
RECEIPT #IP065808 for initial partial filing fee in the amount of $9.62, paid by Plaintiff. (REO)
|
|
Filing 6
Order on Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis - The plaintiff's motion to proceed in forma pauperis, dkt. #3 , is granted to the extent that the plaintiff is assessed an initial partial filing fee of Nine Dollars and Sixty-Two Cents ($9.62). The plaintiff shall have through July 24, 2019, in which to pay this sum to the clerk of the district court. Plaintiff's motion to Correct Clerical Error, dkt. #5 , has been considered and is granted. (See Order.) Signed by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson on 6/27/2019. (DMW)
|
|
Filing 5
MOTION to Correct Clerical Error re #3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, filed by Plaintiff WILLIE DUMES. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Inmate Trust Account, #2 Exhibit Affidavit of Special Circumstances)(DMW)
|
|
Filing 4
MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (REO)
|
|
Filing 3
MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, filed by Plaintiff WILLIE DUMES. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit - Offender Trust Statement)(REO)
|
|
Filing 2
COMPLAINT against R. BROWN, DONALDSON, S. FISCHER, K. GILMORE, F. LITTLEJOHN, MILLER, K. WATTS, filed by WILLIE DUMES. (No fee paid with this filing) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit - Conduct documents)(REO)
|
|
Filing 1
CONSENT to Prisoner E-Service by WILLIE DUMES located at WVCF. Pursuant to General Order 2013-1, documents submitted by WILLIE DUMES to the court for filing will generate a Notice of Electronic Filing that will constitute official service upon registered users of CM/ECF. If any parties to the case are not registered CM/ECF users, the Clerk of the Court will mail the document via U.S. Postal Service on behalf of the inmate. NOTE: The E-Filing Program does not affect the obligation of other parties to serve copies of documents in accordance with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (REO)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
