MIDDLETON v. KOCH et al
| JASON MICHAEL MIDDLETON |
| SHANA CARRELL, LOUIE KOCH and SHELBY COUNTY MEDICAL PROVIDER |
| 2:2019cv00339 |
| July 16, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
| Mark J Dinsmore |
| James R Sweeney |
| Prisoner Petitions - Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 12, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 13 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed, filed by SHANA CARRELL, LOUIE KOCH. SHANA CARRELL waiver sent on 8/29/2019; LOUIE KOCH waiver sent on 8/29/2019. (Lewandowski, Elizabeth) |
| Filing 12 ***PLEASE DISREGARD - CORRECTED DOCUMENT AT #13 *** NOTICE of Lawsuit & Request for Waiver of Service for Summons Supplied by SHANA CARRELL, LOUIE KOCH. (Lewandowski, Elizabeth) Modified on 9/12/2019 (RSF). |
| Filing 11 NOTICE of Appearance by Elizabeth Lewandowski on behalf of Defendants SHANA CARRELL, LOUIE KOCH. (Lewandowski, Elizabeth) |
| Filing 10 NOTICE of Appearance by Matthew Scott Clark on behalf of Defendants SHANA CARRELL, LOUIE KOCH. (Clark, Matthew) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE of Appearance by Lisa A. Baron on behalf of Defendants SHANA CARRELL, LOUIE KOCH. (Baron, Lisa) |
| Filing 8 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by Non-Party, Chris Holder. (DMW) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Lawsuit & Waiver Issued by Clerk to: 1) Major Louie Koch; 2) Lt. Shana Carrell (DMW) |
| Filing 6 ENTRY SCREENING COMPLAINT, DISMISSING INSUFFICIENT CLAIMS, AND DIRECTING SERVICE OF PROCESS - The claims against defendants Koch and Carrell allege sufficient facts to state a claim of deliberate indifference to a serious medical need in violation of the Eighth Amendment. Those claims shall proceed. If the plaintiff believes that additional claims were alleged in the complaint but not identified by the Court, he shall have through September 30, 2019, in which to identify those claims. The clerk is directed pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(c)(3) to issue process to defendants Major Louie Koch and Lt. Shana Carrell in the manner specified by Rule 4(d). Process shall consist of the complaint filed on July 16, 2019 (docket #1 ), applicable forms (Notice of Lawsuit and Request for Waiver of Service of Summons and Waiver of Service of Summons), and this Entry. The clerk shall terminate from the docket defendant Shelby County Medical Provider. (See Entry.) Copy to Plaintiff via US Mail. Signed by Judge James R. Sweeney II on 8/29/2019. (DMW) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE to Pro se Litigant - The following information is provided to pro se litigants to inform them about rules and procedures governing how they communicate with the Court. Copy to plaintiff by US Mail. (MEH) |
| Filing 4 ENTRY - The plaintiff's motion to proceed in forma pauperis, dkt. #2 , is granted. No initial partial filing fee is due at this time. (See Entry.) Copy to Plaintiff via US Mail. Signed by Judge James R. Sweeney II on 7/18/2019. (DMW) |
| Filing 3 MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (DJH) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Plaintiff, JASON MICHAEL MIDDLETON. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit of Indigency, Transaction History, #2 Envelope)(DJH) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against SHANA CARRELL, LOUIE KOCH, SHELBY COUNTY MEDICAL PROVIDER, filed by JASON MICHAEL MIDDLETON. (No fee paid with this filing) (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(DJH) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
