PEREZ v. BROWN
| OSCAR PEREZ |
| RICHARD BROWN |
| 2:2019cv00401 |
| August 20, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
| Mark J Dinsmore |
| James R Sweeney |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 4, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 CONSENT to Jurisdiction to US Magistrate Judge by OSCAR PEREZ. (TMC) |
| Filing 8 Respondent's Notice of 42-day Extension of Deadline to File a Return to Order Show Cause, filed by RICHARD BROWN. Return to Order to Show Cause deadline is 11/13/2019. (Rom, Abigail) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by Abigail T. Rom on behalf of Respondent RICHARD BROWN. (Rom, Abigail) |
| Filing 6 RECEIPT #IP066637 for Habeas Filing fee in the amount of $5.00, paid by Petitioner. (AKH) |
Filing 5
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE (Discipline Case) - Oscar Perez's petition for a writ of habeas corpus challenges his disciplinary conviction in disciplinary case number WVE 19-03-0098 on April 8, 2019. The petitioner shall have through September 23, 2019, in which to either pay the $5.00 filing fee for this action or demonstrate his financial inability to do so. The custodian of petitioner is directed to answer the allegations of the petition for a writ of habeas corpus and in doing so shall show cause why the relief sought by the petitioner should not be granted. Show Cause Response due by 10/2/2019. (See Order.) Signed by Judge James R. Sweeney II on 8/21/2019. (DMW)
|
| Filing 4 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by OSCAR PEREZ. (No fee paid with this filing) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B)(AKH) |
| Filing 3 MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (AKH) |
| Filing 2 **PLEASE DISREGARD DOCKETED IN ERROR** COMPLAINT against RICHARD BROWN, filed by OSCAR PEREZ. (No fee paid with this filing) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B)(AKH) Modified on 8/21/2019 (AKH). |
| Filing 1 CONSENT to Prisoner E-Service by OSCAR PEREZ located at WVCF. Pursuant to General Order 2013-1, documents submitted by OSCAR PEREZ to the court for filing will generate a Notice of Electronic Filing that will constitute official service upon registered users of CM/ECF. If any parties to the case are not registered CM/ECF users, the Clerk of the Court will mail the document via U.S. Postal Service on behalf of the inmate. NOTE: The E-Filing Program does not affect the obligation of other parties to serve copies of documents in accordance with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (AKH) (Main Document 1 replaced on 8/21/2019) (AKH). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: PEREZ v. BROWN | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: OSCAR PEREZ | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: RICHARD BROWN | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
