TODD v. EXPERIAN INFORMATION SOLUTIONS, INC.
| ROGER TODD |
| EXPERIAN INFORMATION SOLUTIONS INC and EXPERIAN INFORMATION SOLUTIONS, INC. |
| 2:2019cv00419 |
| August 27, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
| Mark J Dinsmore |
| Jane Magnus-Stinson |
| James R Sweeney |
| Consumer Credit |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1681 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 22, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 16 Proposed CASE MANAGEMENT PLAN TENDERED, filed by Plaintiff ROGER TODD . (Cohron, Travis) |
| Filing 15 ANSWER to #1 Complaint , filed by EXPERIAN INFORMATION SOLUTIONS, INC..(Seigel, Leah) |
| Filing 14 NOTICE of Reassignment of Case to Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson. Judge James R. Sweeney II is no longer assigned to this case. Please include the new case number, 2:19-cv-00419-JMS-MJD, on all future filings in this matter. (RSF) |
Filing 13
ORDER OF RECUSAL. Clerk is directed to randomly reassign case and notify parties of newly assigned Judge. Signed by Judge James R. Sweeney II on 10/2/2019. (BRR)
|
|
Filing 12
SCHEDULING ORDER: This matter is scheduled for a telephonic initial pretrial conference on Tuesday, October 29, 2019 at 3:00 p.m. (Eastern). Counsel shall attend the conference by calling the designated telephone number, to be provided by the Court via email generated by the Court's ECF system. The parties shall file a proposed Case Management Plan (CMP) no fewer than seven days before the pretrial conference. Unless the parties agree there are compelling reasons for a departure, the CMP shall be in the format set forth in the model CMP found on the Court's website (www.insd.uscourts.gov). Section III(A) through (E) of the proposed CMP shall include the following deadlines. SEE ORDER for Deadlines. Signed by Magistrate Judge Mark J. Dinsmore on 9/24/2019.(JRB) Modified on 9/23/2019 (JRB). Modified on 10/2/2019 (GD).
|
| Filing 11 Corporate Disclosure Statement by EXPERIAN INFORMATION SOLUTIONS, INC. identifying Corporate Parent EXPERIAN PLC, Other Affiliate CENTRAL SOURCE LLC, Other Affiliate ONLINE DATA EXCHANGE LLC, Other Affiliate NEW MANAGEMENT SERVICES LLC, Other Affiliate VANTAGESCORE SOLUTIONS LLC, Other Affiliate OPT-OUT SERVICES LLC for EXPERIAN INFORMATION SOLUTIONS, INC... (Seigel, Leah) |
| Filing 10 NOTICE of Parties' First Extension of Time, filed by Defendant EXPERIAN INFORMATION SOLUTIONS, INC.. (Seigel, Leah) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE of Appearance by Leah Lewis Seigel on behalf of Defendant EXPERIAN INFORMATION SOLUTIONS, INC.. (Seigel, Leah) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE of Appearance by Taylor Hunter on behalf of Defendant EXPERIAN INFORMATION SOLUTIONS, INC.. (Hunter, Taylor) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by Todd A. Dixon on behalf of Defendant EXPERIAN INFORMATION SOLUTIONS, INC.. (Dixon, Todd) |
| Filing 6 PROCEDURES AND PRACTICES before Judge James R. Sweeney II. (DMW) |
| Filing 5 MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (DMW) |
| Filing 4 Summons Issued as to EXPERIAN INFORMATION SOLUTIONS, INC. (DMW) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by Travis W. Cohron on behalf of Plaintiff ROGER TODD. (Cohron, Travis) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by G. John Cento on behalf of Plaintiff ROGER TODD. (Cento, G.) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against EXPERIAN INFORMATION SOLUTIONS INC, filed by ROGER TODD. (Filing fee $400, receipt number 0756-5601085) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons)(Cohron, Travis) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
