SECO DE LUCENA v. WATSON
JOHN J. SECO DE LUCENA |
T.J. WATSON |
2:2019cv00439 |
September 9, 2019 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
Doris L Pryor |
James R Sweeney |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 24, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 8 ORDER - granting #7 Motion for Extension of Time. The Respondent shall have to and including January 24, 2020, to file its response to the 2241 motion. Respondent's First Motion for Extension of Time [dkt. #6 ] is DENIED AS MOOT. Copy to petitioner via US Mail. Signed by Judge James R. Sweeney II on 10/23/2019. (RSF) |
Filing 7 Amended MOTION for Extension of Time to January 24, 2020 to Respond to the Petitioner's 28 U.S.C. 2241 petition, filed by Respondent T.J. WATSON. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Reitz, Brian) |
Filing 6 First MOTION for Extension of Time to January 24, 2020 in which to #3 Order to Show Cause , filed by Respondent T.J. WATSON. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Reitz, Brian) |
Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by Brian L. Reitz on behalf of Respondent T.J. WATSON. (Reitz, Brian) |
Filing 4 RECEIPT #IP066668 for Habeas Filing fee in the amount of $5.00, paid by Petitioner. (AKH) |
Filing 3 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE - The respondent shall have until 10/25/2019, in which to answer the allegations of the habeas petition, and in doing so shall show cause why the relief sought by the petitioner should not be granted. The petitioner shall have twenty-eight days after service of the answer in which to reply. The petitioner shall have twenty-eight days, in which to either pay the $5.00 filing fee or demonstrate his financial inability to do so (see order). Signed by Judge James R. Sweeney II on 9/13/2019 (copy mailed per distribution list).(TMC) |
Filing 2 MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (AKH) |
Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by JOHN J. SECO DE LUCENA. (No fee paid with this filing). (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Supporting Facts, #2 Exhibit B - Pre-Sentence Report, #3 Exhibit C - Case Summary). (AKH) (Additional attachment(s) added on 9/10/2019: #4 Envelope) (AKH). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: SECO DE LUCENA v. WATSON | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Respondent: T.J. WATSON | |
Represented By: | Brian L. Reitz |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Petitioner: JOHN J. SECO DE LUCENA | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.