SERRANO v. ARAMARK FOOD SERVICES et al
| JUAN SERRANO |
| ARAMARK FOOD SERVICES, D. BEDWELL, WALLACE, J. SCHILLING and C. ORNDORFF |
| 2:2019cv00510 |
| October 25, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
| Mark J Dinsmore |
| James Patrick Hanlon |
| Prisoner Petitions - Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 23, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 11 Documents for Service by IDOC - re #9 Entry, #1 Complaint, #10 NOTICE of Lawsuit & Waiver Issued by Clerk. (RSF) |
| Filing 10 NOTICE of Lawsuit & Waiver Issued by Clerk upon (1) Aramark Food Services; (2) D. Bedwell; (3) C. Orndorff; (4) Mrs. Wallace; and (5) J. Schilling. (RSF) |
Filing 8
ORDER Directing Monthly Payments be made from Prison Account of JUAN SERRANO -TO: Warden, WABASH VALLEY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY - As of the issuance of this Order, the balance of the filing fee still due in this case is $321.68. (See Order.) Copies mailed pursuant to distribution list. Signed by Judge James Patrick Hanlon on 12/23/2019.(RSF)
|
| Filing 9 Entry Screening Complaint and Directing Service of Process - Plaintiff Juan Serrano is an inmate at Wabash Valley Correctional Facility. He filed this civil action alleging that the defendants allowed food contaminated with rodent feces to be served at the prison. If Mr. Serrano believes that additional claims were alleged in the complaint, but not identified by the Court, he shall have through January 21, 2020, to identify those claims. The clerk is directed pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(c)(3) to issue process to defendants D. Bedwell, C. Orndorff, Mrs. Wallace, J. Schilling, and Aramark Food Services in the manner specified by Rule 4(d). The clerk is directed to serve the Indiana Department of Correction employee, J. Schilling, electronically. The clerk is also requested to send a courtesy copy of this Entry to attorney Christopher D. Cody.(See Entry.) Copies distributed pursuant to distribution list. Signed by Judge James Patrick Hanlon on 12/20/2019.(RSF) |
| Filing 7 RECEIPT #IP067275 for partial filing fee in the amount of $28.32, paid by Plaintiff. (DJH) |
| Filing 6 CONSENT to Jurisdiction to US Magistrate Judge by JUAN SERRANO. (TMC) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE to Pro se Litigant - The following information is provided to pro se litigants to inform them about rules and procedures governing how they communicate with the Court. (Copy sent to plaintiff via US Mail). (JRT) |
|
Filing 4
ORDER - granting #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis to the extent that the plaintiff is assessed an initial partial filing fee of Twenty- Eight Dollars and Thirty-Two Cents ($28.32). The plaintiff shall have through November 28, 2019, in which to pay this sum to the clerk of the district court. (See Order.) Copy to plaintiff via US Mail. Signed by Judge James Patrick Hanlon on 11/1/2019. (RSF)
|
| Filing 3 MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (DJH) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Plaintiff, JUAN SERRANO. (Attachments: #1 Certified Counselors Statement of Inmate Trust Fund Account)(DJH) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against ARAMARK FOOD SERVICES, D. BEDWELL, C. ORNDORFF, J. SCHILLING, WALLACE, filed by JUAN SERRANO. (No fee paid with this filing) (Attachments: #1 Request for Interview, Grievance, Grievance Response Reports, Grievance Appeal)(DJH) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
