DOULIN v. STATE OF INDIANA et al
DWAYNE DOULIN |
JUSTIN LONG, TIMOTHY BROOKWALTER, PUTNAM COUNTY PROSECUTORS OFFICE and STATE OF INDIANA |
2:2019cv00533 |
November 1, 2019 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
Mark J Dinsmore |
James Patrick Hanlon |
Civil Rights: Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 9, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 MOTION to Correct Errors, filed by Plaintiff DWAYNE DOULIN. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(TMC) |
Filing 5 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, filed by Plaintiff DWAYNE DOULIN. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(TMC) |
Filing 4 CONSENT to Jurisdiction to US Magistrate Judge by DWAYNE DOULIN. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(TMC) |
Filing 3 ORDER - Plaintiff, Dwayne Doulin, shall have through December 4, 2019 to pay the $400.00 filing fee or demonstrate that he lacks the financial ability to do so. (See Order.) Copy to plaintiff via US Mail. Signed by Judge James Patrick Hanlon on 11/4/2019.(RSF) |
Filing 2 MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (AKH) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against TIMOTHY BROOKWALTER, JUSTIN LONG, PUTNAM COUNTY PROSECUTORS OFFICE, STATE OF INDIANA, filed by DWAYNE DOULIN. (No fee paid with this filing). (Attachments: #1 Cover Letter). (AKH) (Additional attachment(s) added on 11/1/2019: #2 Envelope) (AKH). Modified on 11/1/2019 (AKH). (Main Document 1 replaced on 11/1/2019) (AKH). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.